Showing posts with label Board of Supervisor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Board of Supervisor. Show all posts

Saturday, January 11, 2014

Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust, Secret Shadow Gloucester, VA Government Extended Into 2014?

Gloucester County, Virginia Vice Chair, Board of Supervisor's, Ashley Chriscoe,  has been assigned a board member seat with what we consider the secret shadowy Gloucester, Virginia government, Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust.  An organization that makes no sense in anything they do other than to extend themselves into the county government and make changes that seem to do more harm to the businesses on Main Street than they do good and cost taxpayers a lot of extra money they should not need to spend.

  The tentacles of the Gloucester Main Street Area seem to continue to grow well past their initial intended area and digging into the pockets of many taxpayers who have shown their dislike for such.   The Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust is not a non profit organization.  As such, since they are conducting business, they must be a for profit business.  If this is so, do they have a business license?  And if they have a business license, why is a county Board of Supervisor, Vice Chair sitting on their board as a board appointment?   Last year we showed how Louise Theberge sat on a seat with the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust and voted on any project that came up before the Board of Supervisors through the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust.  Will Ashley Chriscoe use his new position to expose this group or will he excuse himself from any votes that come up with any business coming from the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust?  We will be watching this very closely.  Carter Borden is back on the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust Board of Directors this year, but he is no longer a Board of Supervisor so it's a non issue.  He can just help the GMSPT Board with inside county info based on having been on the inside.

  Louise Theberge is off the board this year.  Guess her usefulness is no longer useful.  Carter Borden was on the GMSPT Board back in 2011 when he was also the chair of the Board of Supervisors.  We have not looked at his voting record for when he sat on both seats.

  From the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust website, Projects page.

"http://mspt.org/projects.html

Lamppost Basket Beautification Project

Description Of The Project

Beginning in 2007 and running thru 2010, the Main Street Preservation Trust managed and predominantly funded the installment, planting, and maintenance of 40 flowering lamppost baskets along Gloucester Main Street.  Several baskets are sponsored by community organizations, businesses, and individuals memorializing and honoring others.  These baskets have become a welcomed addition to Spring and are generally installed in early May and remain a constant visual treat until the end of October.  The baskets have served to enhance the overall aesthetics and environment on Main Street and have been enjoyed by residents and visitors alike.  To sponsor a basket, please download the form below.  Please note that as of 2011, the Cook Foundation will be taking the lead on this project as they are a 501c3 organization and therefore any lamppost basket sponsorships are tax deductible.  Please consider joining us in our beautification efforts

So as noted above in their own information, they are not a non profit organization.  If they are a trust, then how is this trust being funded and where is the money coming from?  Why do they keep working on expanding their area of control?  Why are they embedded into the county government?  Why do they even get involved in planning outside of their own business concerns?  These are some questions they simply do not answer.  It's questions every taxpayer in this county needs to be asking.  A group of concerned citizens?  Really?  Why are they not spending their money on advertising instead of giving away matching funds for facades on Main Street, but doing nothing to draw in visitors? 

  They claim to promote and sponsor events that help the businesses on Main Street such as market days where they want you to come to the Farmers Market and skip going to the actual farmers market that is already on Main Street during the summer?  Virginia Symphony concerts help local businesses how when it is held when businesses are closed?  Blues and Brews helps local merchants how?  They are selling beer and food at the event.  We simply do not get it.  

  What is also interesting is the fact that last year, they considered themselves a non profit and county records show this.  Yet according to sites that list all non profits have never listed the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust and again, the trust claims on their site that as of 2011, they are not a non profit organization.  Anyone remember last year's Daffodil festival fiasco?  They allow county non profit organizations to run special events without having to pay special fees, because they are exempt.  Blue and Brews was to be run under the umbrella of the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust instead of the Gloucester Main Street Association due to the Gloucester Main Street Association is a for profit business.  We still have the Gloucester Mathews Gazette Journal articles on this in our office.  

  Are we all being conned by a criminal organization?  We just went through the old story and it looks like we have all been conned a lot more than anyone knows.  According to the old article, Ted Wilmot, (Twitching Ted I'm not an attorney, Wilmot) Gloucester County Attorney, (Court Jester, we will figure out a way to make it happen no matter what the law says),  was working on getting an itinerant merchant exemption for a for profit organization, the Gloucester Main Street Association.  What is that about?  We covered issues with Brew Jam in the past here on this site.

  We will continue to dig on these issues as it all looks incredibly strange to say the very least.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Gloucester Schools are Constitutional?

Historic Yorktown, Virginia

Open Letter to the Citizens of Gloucester County Virginia


Did you get a chance to go to the candidates for the School Board and Board of Supervisors?  I did not however, Mr. Thompson has it on his blog for you to enjoy.  I found it interesting one of the School Board Candidates and a local lawyer Ms. Hook said our schools are constitutional.

The Virginia Constitution was written for us to limit the government intrusion into our lives.  Have you ever read the Constitution of the United States?  How about the Constitution of Virginia?

Article VIII (8) Education in the Virginia Constitution covers this. 
“Section 1. Public schools of high quality to be maintained.
The General Assembly shall provide for a system of free public elementary and secondary schools for all children of school age throughout the Commonwealth, and shall seek to ensure that an educational program of high quality is established and continually maintained.”

Looking at Section 1 we will have free public schools provided by the General Assembly.  Are the schools free? Do you have to pay fees for your children to go to school? Makes me wonder what they are doing with the funding provided by the General Assembly?

“Section 2.  Standards of quality; State and local support of public schools…..   ….The General Assembly shall determine the manner in which funds are to be provided for the cost of maintaining an educational program meeting the prescribed standards of quality, and shall provide for the apportionment of the cost of such program between the Commonwealth and the local units of government comprising such school divisions. Each unit of local government shall provide its portion of such cost by local taxes or from other available funds.”

Looking at Section 2 I see why we have to pay “….funds are to be provided for the cost of maintaining an educational program meeting the prescribed standards of quality….” Maybe if our school met the required standards we would not have to pay.

As county residents we need to let the school board know we expect the schools to meet the prescribed standards.  If the staff is not capable we need to get rid of them and replace them with people that can meet the standards.  Is the Kiser too busy looking to make a name for himself with the new swamp school and working on the final solution for our youth that he does not have time to worry about meeting standards?  This needs to stop. Meet the standards or get out.  This violates your oath of office wanting a .brass plaque with your likeness and name rather than meeting school standards.  Are you too busy wheeling and dealing to get the swamp school you cannot meet the obligations of your contract?

I am not a lawyer and cannot give legal advice.  Our founding fathers used common sense and Christian scripture when establishing our founding documents. 

“For the Common Good. “

Sincerely,
Alexander James Jay

P.S.  "The good Education of Youth has been esteemed by wise Men in all Ages, as the surest Foundation of the Happiness both of private Families and of Common-wealths. Almost all Governments have therefore made it a principal Object of their Attention, to establish and endow with proper Revenues, such Seminaries of Learning, as might supply the succeeding Age with Men qualified to serve the Publick with Honour to themselves, and to their Country."  --Benjamin Franklin, Proposals Relating to the Education of Youth in Pensilvania, 1749
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Gloucester, VA Speaking for…..

Open Letter to the Citizens of Gloucester County Virginia


The Virginia Constitution was written for us to limit the government intrusion into our lives.  Have you ever read the Constitution of the United States?  How about the Constitution of Virginia?

Speaking for the taxpayers in Gloucester County; we want the Board of Supervisors to answer these questions.  Why are we paying full time salaries for part time staff?

Why are we paying for a County Attorney that you have made into a Court Jester? Granted he is entertaining and quite a site but that is a lot of money to spend for 2 hours of entertainment a month and you did not let him perform during the last Board of Supervisors meeting.  I was disappointed.  Although Brenda was not a bad stand in as County Jester in the last meeting and if you keep getting her to answer for the County Attorney in the meetings in a month or two we will vote for her as our favorite Jester, she still needs a little more practice.  Can she juggle or get a better script about a subject she knows something about?

Also, we are paying for a full time County Administrator and you are not allowing her to do this? Or does she want to be the County Attorney or County Jester we are not sure which based on her performance at the last meeting?  Is she qualified to be our County Attorney?  She still needs work to take over as County Jester, in my opinion.  Maybe we should let her run the County and get the employees back on the job and out of the fast food establishments unless they are picking up food for her and The "Kiser".

Speaking of The "Kiser", you pay for him even if the School Board made this selection.  His final solution for our youth in the design and placement of the new swamp school does not appear to have the education, safety, and interest of our youth as the primary goal in this new school?  We have several members of the Board that claim to have interest in our schools and youth, it does not appear this is the case to some tax payers.  It appears that you have developed a final solution that is more fitting as the end of our youth rather than the education of our youth.  You have forgotten the most important part of the new swamp school; you need to have a huge bronze plaque with The "Kiser’s" likeness, his name, along with the name of all the school board, and board of supervisors that are responsible for this facility.  Do not place it too close to the school we do not want it to sink into the swamp with the school.  We want to remember all of the people responsible for bring us this swamp school.

Based on the continued actions or inaction's of this Board it appears you have a total contempt for the tax payers, Virginia Constitution, Virginia Code, the US Constitution and oath of office.

Bring back the rule of legal laws and make this "The Land of the Life Worth Living" for everyone in the county.

I am not a lawyer and cannot give legal advice.  Our founding fathers used common sense and Christian scripture when establishing our founding documents. 

“For the Common Good. “

Sincerely,
Alexander James Jay

P.S.  "The same prudence which in private life would forbid our paying our own money for unexplained projects, forbids it in the dispensation of the public moneys."
Thomas Jefferson, letter to Shelton Gilliam, 1808
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 30, 2013

Gloucester, VA Page Middle School Corruption?

Received From A Local Very Concerned Resident:  This Needs Your Attention Everyone:

I am a resident of Gloucester CountyVirginia, retired from the U.S. Army and former construction site work and utility superintendent.  Since becoming physically disabled and unable to work I have become more involved in what is occurring in my local government and public school system.  Upon submission of a letter to the editor of a local newspaper, I was advised by that editor that the newspaper would be unable to print my letter for legal reasons and suggested I contact the Virginia Attorney General’s Office with my information and contentions.
 
Sometime in May or June 2011 the Gloucester School Board, the Board of Supervisors and the Public Schools Superintendent began publicly disregarding input from Gloucester’s residents and the Gloucester Board of Supervisors on matters pertaining to the rebuilding of Page Middle School which was damaged by a tornado on April 16, 2011.  School Board and Board of Supervisor meeting videos and minutes pertaining to Page Middle School reconstruction clearly document the level of disregard.  It appears that what began as a community disaster quickly turned into the means for the School Board, the Board of Supervisors and the Schools Superintendent and possibly others to assist certain land developers in having Gloucester tax payers and possibly VDOT pay for several million dollars worth of infrastructure that will enable certain developers to make significant financial gains.  Many Gloucester residents believe numerous improprieties and violations of law have occurred throughout the Page Middle School rebuilding process.
 
The acreage of this school site is in excess of the Virginia Department of Education guidelines of ten acres for a middle school complex and contained actively used sports fields with fences, lighting, seating, concession stand and parking.  The lighting, seating and concession stand were removed from the property, but the fields are still actively being used through utilizing a portable concession stand and portable lighting systems.  The School Board ultimately voted to rebuild Page Middle School on Gloucester County owned property that is located across Route 17 from the Page site and about three tenths of a mile down T.C. Walker Road.
 
During the months after the tornado, the School’s Superintendent and the School Board held multiple public comment meetings at which almost all residents requested that Page be reconstructed on the existing site.  Essentially, Gloucester’s residents asked for a quality built, community storm shelter capable, environmentally friendly, shooter safe, technology equipped, low maintenance and fully functional school to be constructed by the most efficient and economical means possible.  The School Board, the Board of Supervisors and the School’s Superintendent also received numerous emails requesting the same even though during a significant amount of the Page reconstruction planning process the School Board’s email account was restricted from accepting emails from accounts outside of the school system.  The Schools Superintendent seemed to be guiding the School Board through the process, acting more like a salesperson than superintendent. During a joint meeting between the School Board and the Board of Supervisors, Supervisors Robert Orth and Andy James expressed their displeasure about how he and other members of the community were left out of the planning process on what to do to reconstruct Page.  The initial site work has now been completed at the new Page Middle School location and the contract to build the school building has been awarded.

  The New Page Middle School will not be usable as a community storm shelter nor will the new undersized gym be usable for competitive sporting events like the gym that was demolished could.  The School Board selected developing new building plans, developing a new site, mitigating wetlands, extending utilities, building turn lanes, placing traffic control lights and making other improvements at the Route 17, T.C. Walker Road intersection over building a full sized, fully functional community wanted and community usable public school building.    
 
Property records reflect that one day prior to the Gloucester School Board publicly voting to rebuild Page Middle School on property it received from the Pella P. Hundley Trust in 2004, local business man and developer Harry Corr purchased all 26.79 acres of Route 17 road frontage property that is connected to the Gloucester County property where the new school is being built.  The Gloucester County property and Mr. Corr’s adjoining property also extend along T.C. Walker Road.  Property records indicate Mr. Corr purchased the Route 17 frontage property from the Hundley Trust for $420,000.00.  This was and is more than four times the assessed value.  When the Hundley property was received by Gloucester County in 2004 it appears the almost 27 acres of land that Mr. Corr purchased was divided from the property intended for Gloucester County and placed back into the Hundley Trust. The reason for this division is unknown.  Mr. Corr owns and controls close to 400 acres of land that connects to the old Page Middle School land and connecting Gloucester public school transportation complex.  The extension of the waterline and other utilities to supply the new school, placement of traffic control lights and other improvements to the Route 17, T.C. Walker intersection will financially benefit Mr. Corr who seemed to know prior to the School Board’s vote that Page would be re-built on the property received from the Hundley Trust. 
 
Property records reflect that along and across T.C. Walker Road from the new Page Middle School there are 1,896.53 acres of land that is owned or controlled by Ingles Investments, LLC and Breckenridge Ingles.  This is about 97% of the land contained within the circle formed by Routes 17, 628, 629 and 614.  Mr. Ingles is a partner in local law firm Martin, Ingles and Hensley, Ltd. Gloucester School Board member Kimberly Hensley’s husband Devin Hensley is also a partner in the same law firm as Mr. Ingles. A significant amount of the Ingles’ land that was once wooded has now been cleared.  Full development of the land will require the improvements and traffic control light placement at the T.C. Walker Road, Route 17 intersection.  It will also require the completion of the waterline loop and extension of other utilities.  Extension of these infrastructure items are normally paid for by for profit developers, but now will be paid for by Gloucester County tax payers and possibly VDOT because the decision was made to vacate an already developed site in order to build on the T.C. Walker Road property.  
 
There is an existing waterline that currently forms an incomplete loop from the Route 17, Shortlane Road intersection down Shortlane Road and partially along T.C. Walker Road. (See attached map)  To complete this waterline infrastructure loop and maximize its supply capability the waterline would need to be extended the rest of the length of T.C. Walker Road and be connected to the main waterline located across Route 17 at the Route 17, T.C. Walker Road intersection.  Upon the School Board’s submission of the Page Middle School site work plans to the Gloucester Building Inspections Office, a requirement from that office to complete the waterline loop was initially made and eventually rescinded due to resistance from the Board of Supervisors and the community.  It was determined that a waterline extended from the opposite side of Route 17 and down T.C. Walker Road to the new school entrance would suffice in supplying the school’s needs and could be connected to at a later date to complete the loop.  This, at the very least eliminates the cost of crossing the four lanes and median strip of Route 17 from the developers budget.  Completion of the waterline loop, other utility extensions, traffic control light placement and other improvements of the Route 17, T.C. Walker Road intersection will financially benefit Mr. Ingles and Ingles Investments, LLC.  During a recent joint meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board, non-elected School Board member Kimberly Hensley suggested the Gloucester Public School’s transportation complex, which connects to the old Page Middle School property, be moved to a new Gloucester County Transportation Division/Public School Transportation Division complex that could be built on 22 acres of Gloucester County owned land located near the T.C. Walker Building off of T.C. Walker Road.  Building the complex proposed by Mrs. Hensley would likely require completion of the waterline loop.  Which would also provide financial gains for the developer.   
 
The continual decrease in Gloucester Public Schools student enrollment associated with the nations economic down turn brought about the possibility of having to close a Gloucester school. RRMM Architects was awarded a contract on April 21, 2010 for the purpose of providing possible solutions for the “Repurposing of Page Middle School into a School Administration and Operations Center. On March 25, 2011 that contract was extended to June 30, 2012.  On April 16, 2011 Page Middle School was damaged by a tornado.  On June 6, 2011 a Purchase Order submitted by RRMM was approved by Gloucester County in the amount of $10,000.00 for “emergency work done to support investigative needs of schools to assess damage”.  On June 6, 2011 another Purchase Order submitted by RRMM was approved by Gloucester County in the amount of $17,000.00 for “emergency work done to support investigative needs of schools to assess damage”.  On June 15, 2011 a Request for Professional Services to “review the potential for reconstructing Page Middle School was advertised.  On July 7, 2011 another Purchase Order submitted by RRMM was approved by Gloucester County in the amount of $13,545.00 for “schematic design/feasibility study-committee facilitation for Page Middle School options study”. 

 This work included creating schematic design options of proposed facilities and locations, facilitating a Schools Superintendent appointed study-committee for Page reconstruction options and presenting those options to the School Board.  At a School Board meeting on July 12, 2011 the Gloucester Schools Superintendent, announced the receipt of eleven proposals in response to the June 15, 2011 Request for Professional Services.  On August 9, 2011 Duane Harver, Principle for RRMM, publicly presented information to the Gloucester School Board pertaining the July 7, 2011 study committee facilitation purchase order.  RRMM was awarded the Professional Services contract on January 10, 2012.  By this time RRMM’s involvement in the reconstruction professional services process was extensive.  RRMM was clearly given an advantage over the other eleven architectural firms who submitted bids in that they were already performing work described in the June 15th Request for Professional Services before it was advertised and the contract awarded.  Having worked closely with project estimators in the past I contacted several of the bidder’s representatives who expressed the same opinion.  One bidder’s representative suggested their company had considered contesting the contract award, but decided against it.
 
The School Board, the Board of Supervisors and the Schools Superintendent have caused the waste of a substantial amount of Gloucester County education money in their quest to vacate adequate and suitable school land containing existing athletic fields, infrastructure and an approved VDOT School Zone during a time of economic downturn and limited financial resources.  More importantly, they did so against the will of their constituents and fellow Gloucester County managers.  In doing so they manipulated the Professional Services procurement and bidding process and took many other actions which raise many questions that Gloucester residents deserve, but cannot obtain answers to.  What caused the School Board and Schools Superintendent to become so rebellious against the Gloucester community during the aftermath of the tornado?  Why have so many of Gloucester’s residents become reluctant to serve on the School Board?   Why did the School Board and the Schools Superintendent manipulate the procurement of professional services process?  Why, after hiring RRMM Architects for the purpose of providing possible solutions for the repurposing of Page Middle School into a School Administration and Operations Center, did they destroy the Page Middle School gym and auditorium and begin discussing the possible sale of the land?  Why do they want to relocate the school transportation complex all of a sudden?  Why did they choose to sacrifice building a complete, fully functional and community wanted school to develop a new school site?  What caused Mr. Corr to purchase the Route 17 frontage property one day before the School Board voted to change the site location?  Why was School Board member Kimberly Hensley allowed to render input and vote on matters pertaining to the T.C. Walker Road land without disclosing a possible conflict of interest?  Not being able to obtain credible answers to these questions, the actions of the School Board and Schools Superintendent since shortly after the tornado, and the underlying land and utility issues have caused many within the Gloucester community to suspect corruption exists within their local government.

Written By:

Kenneth E. Hogge, Sr.    
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Constitution Day

Open Letter to the Citizens of Gloucester County Virginia


September 17, 2013 is the 226th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution.  What a perfect time to tell our Supervisors it is time to restore our constitutional government (US and Virginia) to the County of Gloucester.  When this is restored we will have "The Land of the Life Worth Living"

The Virginia Constitution was written for us to limit the government intrusion into our lives.  Have you ever read the Constitution of the United States?  How about the Constitution of Virginia?

Mr. Thompson has shown in recent stories that the County Manager and Attorney are responsible for the day to day running our County Government.  He has also shown they are either unable or unwilling to do their jobs.  What has been done to make county employees obey county and state code and stop using the vehicles for personal use? What has been done to remove illegal code from the County Code? Sounds like both of these people can be fired with cause.  Maybe they should reimburse the county for the expenses they have incurred for the County for their activities that are questionable?  If these two people find following Virginia Constitution and code as well as County Code we are better off without them costing us more money.  The Board of Supervisors deserves competent advisors and administrators upholding County Code and ensuring the employees know and follow these rules.  To still find County vehicles parked at local restaurants and illegal code on the County Code is not acceptable.  If Mr. Thompson has to do Ted the county jesters job then the county should hire Mr. Thompson as a consultant since he is not a lawyer and reduce Ted’s pay to cover actual work being done.

Tell your Board representatives no more ”criminals with no regard for the law,” illegal code, and county employees not willing to follow the law need to be fired for cause with no severance pay or retirement. We deserve "The Land of the Life Worth Living" but until the board is told we will not put up with their behavior that violates their oath of office we will not have "The Land of the Life Worth Living" only the few that are friends of the ruling class with have these things.  This is not for the Common Good.

I am not a lawyer and cannot give legal advice.  Our founding fathers used common sense and Christian scripture when establishing our founding documents. 

“For the Common Good. “

Sincerely,
Alexander James Jay

P.S.  This was shared with me on Sunday afternoon and it fits with our Commonwealth “For the Common Good”.  “Do all the good you can. By all the means you can. In all the ways you can. In all the places you can. At all the times you can. To all the people you can. As long as ever you can.” ― John Wesley
Enhanced by Zemanta