Gloucester Animal Control Meta Data Concerns

As we have been discussing throughout this case, meta data as evidence can be very tricky and can say a lot or say very little.  In this case, it continues to say a great deal.  What we are about to show you is the meta data we have pulled from the Gloucester Animal Control audio files DW_C0152, DW_C0153 and DW_C0154.  These we found to be very unusual.  We will address the issues after we show you these files.

On the meta data from Jeff Stillman's last photo, Jeff Stillman and Steve Baraneck were finished on the property at 12:17 PM.  That means they started back towards their office in the courthouse area at around 12:20 PM..  Average drive time between the victims property and their office is between 20 and 25 minutes putting them into the parking lot for the Animal Control office at about 12:40 and 12:45.

Advertisement:  Free MP3 album download.  Diablo Swing Band, The Butchers Ballroom.  No strings, no catch, no kidding.  Read the stories, follow the links, get stuff, save money.  Click Here

Click On Image To Enlarge

  A more than fair assessment especially on a Tuesday while school was still in session.  Steve was using a digital IC recorder to audio tape the events.  (Pictured in hand above).  Looking at the meta data, one would say that the time and date stamps seem to be in line with all other evidence.  A few things to take into consideration.  One, there are two types of IC recorders.  One type only allows for transfer of the audio to a computer in real time.  That would mean that the above meta data is virtually impossible to achieve without forging fake meta data.  (Not at all impossible mind you).

  The other type of transfer on the more expensive models allows for USB data transfer cables to download and or even upload audio files.  With that said, let's assume that Gloucester Animal Control uses the type with the data transfer cables.  That would make the above meta data look more authentic then.  Right?  Well not so fast.  We contacted several manufacturers of these IC reorders.  Here is what we learned.

  The units with the data transfer cables also separately record meta data date and time onto each audio file independent of each computer recording of meta data.  What does that mean?  That means it is very easy for forge and fake meta data coming from one of these IC recorders.  How?  Take out the battery for a minute and reset the date and time on the IC Recorder.  I can record a conversation today and create meta data that shows that the conversation took place on May 4th, 2010 and 1:04 PM.  

Click On Image To Enlarge

This is one of the email responses we received back from the world's largest manufacturer of IC recorders, Sony Corporation.  We own an IC recorder and have the manual for it.  We also have Sony's software for transferring audio data to computers.  We know every type of compression codec's used for conversion of the audio files.  Yes, you can save the files as WAV files, however, there is a second set of meta data on Gloucester Animal Control's files.  Let's look at it.

Sony allows you to save in WAV format, but guess what?  Sony does not use IMA ADCPI compression at all.  IMA ADCPI is used by Microsoft and Apple respectfully as it is a 4 to 1 compression of WAV files.  Sony uses other WAV compression technologies.  What does this mean?  A very high probability that the audio is fake in every respect. 

Click On Image To Enlarge

The above is from our own manual for our Sony IC recorder.  We have the ICD-BX112 model.  We have to transfer in real time as we did not opt for the USB data transfer cable.  Another note we must make.  IC recorders start and stop each recording with a distinctive beep.  These beeps are missing from Gloucester Animal Control's recordings DW_C0152, DW_C0153 and DW_C0154.  We are continuing to scour the sites of other manufacturers to check their codec technologies.  We have not found one yet that uses the IMA ADCPI technology codec.   As we have said in the past, this is exactly why courts rarely allow this type of evidence.  It must first be put through tremendous scrutiny before it is even allowed to be considered.  Gloucester Circuit Court never even scrutinized these recordings in the least bit.

You can catch up on the entire story over on this site.  https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/

Congressman Rob Wittman And Staff Help Out On Case

Click On Image To Enlarge

Congressman Robert Wittman's staff sent us a letter offering us assistance, on the case we have been reporting on, a few weeks ago.  Today we met with one of his staff members who proved to provide us with invaluable assistance.  As always we are very grateful to both Congressman Robert Wittman and his staff.  Their professionalism and hospitality are of the highest standards we have ever experienced with politicians but must also include the outstanding professionalism and hospitality equaled by Senator Mark Warner in the past.

You can visit our other site to catch up on the entire story here.  https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/


Advertisement:  Download free MP3 music.  Click Here for the full album from Scuola Campanaria di Roncobello.  No catch.  No kidding.  Read the stories, follow the links, get stuff, save money.

Darrell Warren Not Supported For Next Sheriff

We can not possibly back present acting Sheriff, Darrell Warren for the next Gloucester County Sheriff.  Though we do not know much about him, he was the right hand man of past Sheriff, Steve Gentry and with all the issues surrounding Gentry, how can anyone possibly say that Darrell Warren was not aware of what Gentry was up to?  It's possible Warren didn't know anything and was kept in the dark.  Possible, not probable however.  The only thing we have come across on Warren was a receipt for motorcycle parts in his name among papers that also included an arrest warrant for a minor in a house where the minor quickly left Gloucester County.  Not enough to make a case in any direction.  Just a very odd combination of items to be found.

  We know even less about Ledbetter.  All we know is that he was a past deputy in Gloucester.  We do not know when that was though.  We will wait until August and see who all the contenders are for the final part of the race.  Who else is going to throw their hats in?

Advertisement:  Free software.  Edit MP3 and other formatted music with this easy to use software.  Audacity is the name of this software and it's incredible.  This is the no install version and can be run from your computer or even from a thumb drive.  Read the stories, follow the links, get free stuff, save money. Click Here

Gloucester Animal Control Guilty Of Cruelty To Animals

There is an old saying that a picture is worth a thousand words. Pictures are used to tell stories or support stories every day. Pictures in and of themselves can be manipulated into telling a story in a very certain way. But what happens when you open the meta data on digital pictures? A whole new story can and often does develop. Especially in legal cases. On the case we have been reporting on for the past month now we have been showing a tremendous amount of evidence of tampering and down and outright fraud by both Gloucester County Animal Control and the Gloucester County Sheriff's office to name a few.

Well now we have moved on to the pictures that were taken by two different Animal Control officers. Shaun Doyle and Jeff Stillman. In these pictures is evidence that everyone from the Animal Control office, that were there on the property May 4^th, 2010, lied about the conditions on the property and even criminally produced false evidence to support such. The pictures by themselves without the meta data revealed can be made to tell a story in any way that these people wanted to tell it. Once the meta data was revealed however, a new story came very much into play. We zoomed in on the backgrounds of some of their pictures where evidence was obvious and we were able to build a time line showing through the meta data how they produced false evidence and manipulated evidence.

The new evidence with the meta data revealed simply can not be argued. Here is some interesting information for you. A digital photo contains meta data that never changes no matter how many edits you make to it or how many times it is copied and or altered. It still maintains the time and date stamp of when the original photo was taken and what camera it was taken with along with other technical data that does not mean much to most people. The time and date stamp on Gloucester Animal Control's photo's is very much a smoking gun against them. Gloucester Animal Control was using Kodak Z885 cameras. The 885 means 8 mega pixels and 5 times optical zoom.

Advertisement:  Free Office Suite.  Open Office.  This is free software.  No gimmicks, no come on's, no sign up's.  No kidding.  Read the stories, follow the links, get stuff, save money.  Click Here.

Though we will not publish to the public all of the evidence that we are reporting about in this story, we can show you a few samples here that does not reveal anything private about the victims so you have a better understanding of what we are reporting to you. The pictures below are part of the actual time line evidence on our secure site.

Click On Image To Enlarge

Both Animal Control and Sheriff's Deputies claimed that there was no water on the property for the animals on the property.  Yet their own photographic evidence says otherwise.  This is one of a number of pictures showing such.

This picture is one of Animal Controls files of evidence that there was no water on the property for animals.  Look at the mud ring around the area of the tub and then look at the next picture.

Animal Control drained the water out of the tub and waited for it all to dissipate before taking the photo above this one.  All you have to do is note the date and time on each photo's meta data.  We don't just have one photo like this.  We have a bunch of them.  The meta data shows plenty of water on the property and then water drained out of their containers.  That's cruelty to animals as perpetrated by Animal Control and with the help of the Gloucester County Sheriff's Office.  We have a private secure site we built for law enforcement investigators and the entire time line of evidence is on that site.  There is a lot of evidence on that site that we can not post publicly as it would violate the privacy of the victims in this case.

Visit  https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/  for all the information on this case in one central location.

VDOT Wants More Of Your Money - E_Z Pass Rate Increases

Dear E-ZPass Customer,

With Virginia’s E-ZPass program doubling over the next several years as new toll roads open, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is proposing a monthly fee of about $1 per transponder to pay for administrative and operations costs.

VDOT has the utmost understanding that E-ZPass operations brings convenience and efficiency to toll operations. E-ZPass allows for electronic toll collection at Virginia toll facilities and lessens the need for manual collection. However, there is a cost to providing the service to the participating toll facilities, most of which are not operated by VDOT. The Virginia E-ZPass program is being expanded to support several new toll facilities scheduled or expected to be opened over the next few years. The cost associated with the enhanced distribution and specialized services for the new facilities and additional transponders requires a new business model.

The proposed monthly fee would cover costs for:
• Buying nearly one-half million transponders
• Implementing a retail program where transponders can be obtained at various stores in Northern Virginia and eventually Hampton Roads
• Providing service at select DMV locations
• Upgrading information technology to accommodate the expanded program
• Account management and processing of toll transactions (managing billing of all transactions)
• Customer service and the operations of three customer service centers

The fee would also help control costs and manage the selection and demand for E-ZPass transponders. The fee would be regularly evaluated to ensure that the charge is generating just enough revenue to maintain and operate the program without generating excess revenues above expenses.

VDOT is accepting comments on the proposed monthly fee through Tuesday, 5 p.m., June 12, 2012. All comments will be reviewed and taken into consideration prior to the final decision on the proposed fee structure.

You can go to www.virginiadot.org/e-zpass for information on the proposed monthly fee increase and provide their comments online. You can submit your comments directly to vdotinfo@vdot.virginia.gov or mail them to:

Office Communications – Third Floor/Annex Bldg.

Virginia Department of Transportation

1401 E. Broad St.

Richmond, VA 23219

VDOT expects to have a final decision in June.
Thank you for being a valued E-ZPass customer.

Sincerely,
E-ZPass Virginia

Collecting tolls is a for profit business.  Let the ones making the profits from collecting these tolls pay VDOT.  We are already taxed and fee'd to death now.  $1.00 today, tomorrow it goes to $2.00 and continues to go up.  Voice your opinion.


Advertisement:  Free Computer Game, AForce, For XP, Vista And Win 7.  No sign ups, no gimmicks no kidding.  Read the stories, follw the links, get stuff, save money.  Click Here.

Gloucester Court And Attorney's Collude In Conspiracy

Gloucester County VA, Court Transcript Files

View more presentations from Chuck Thompson.

Gloucester Court And Attorney's Collude In Conspiracy

As we see from the presentation above, Judge Shaw, Monique Donner, Esq, Edwin Wilmot, Esq, and local attorney Michael T Soberick were all involved in the above. Each one of these people had a legal obligation to throw this case out before it even went into the courtroom. To allow this case to have been argued in the slightest is a complete disregard for the law and is a mockery of the judicial system.

These people have made up their own laws outside of actual law. Your hard earned tax dollars paid for this mockery. As we pointed out before, Judge Shaw and Michael T Soberick were once law partners. It was more than an observation that we pointed this out in the past.

This is shear collusion with the intent to defraud. Michael T Soberick took money from the victim in this case and then proceeded to feed her to the wolves. He did not represent his client, he betrayed his client. Monique Donner, Esq, Edwin Wilmot, Esq, both for Gloucester County and Michael T Soberick covered up what they knew were fraudulent recordings and evidence along with a fake search warrant, they helped each other out in this courtroom to hang the victim. There is a lot more in the court transcripts that we will continue to publish that prove this point. All of these people still have their jobs. Does that worry you? It worries us. Also, to date we have not heard a single word from even one of the Gloucester Board of Supervisors on any of this. That too worries us. So now we have to move above them in order that proper investigations and action take place.

See the entire story here.  https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/

Advertisement:  Free MP3 Album music.  Free download.  No sign up's no questions, no gimmicks, no kidding.  Click Here for DavidKDB Album.  Read the stories, follow the links, get stuff, save money.

Gloucester VA News New Web Site - Chronological Order Of Our Stories

https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/home  Is a link to our newest site.  This site is a chronological order of the story we have been reporting on for the past month now.  We just finished all the updates on the site and now just need to go back in and fix a minor issue in a few areas.  It's ready for public view though right now.  We will be updating that site as often as we update this site.   We will be adding this into our side bar as a link very soon.

USERL Thinks You Are Stupid

Take a look at the above video and please pay special attention to the fence around the horses on this property.  Now we are going to show you pictures from the USERL site claiming that the pictures on their site are the horses on that same farm.  Notice the background fences in their own pictures.  They do not match.

I see a lot of issues here.  Is it possible that USERL is trying to con everyone to pull in funds?  Why is there such a disparity in the video and these pictures?  Do they really think we are all this stupid?  You decide.

Here is a link to their site with these pictures.  http://www.userl.org/DinwiddieCountyHorses.html

Gloucester, VA Links and News.  GVLN Website.

Gloucester Animal Control Audio Audit Testing Shows Serious Issues

The above audio shows some very serious issues with the Gloucester Animal Control file DW_C0152 and Steve Baranek's claims about the audio.  We were granted permission by the victims in this case to go back to their property and conduct a number of simulation tests.  Our objective was to see if any area of the audio could be even considered somewhat authentic.  All of our simulation tests failed to show any accuracy with the audio, DW_C0152, as could have possibly happened the way the audio claims it did.  We loaded the audio onto one of our tablets and tried numerous recreations to validate any area of the audio.  Every simulation we tried just did not stand up.

  Let's start with this above audio.  Steve Baranek would have you believe he is driving down a road and then into the driveway of the victims property.  Yet you do not hear any motor running nor do you hear any tire road noise.  In fairness, we cut out tiny sections of audio file DW_C0152 where the victims names and later address was used.  In our own simulation, we used a pocket recorder like Steve was using.  It's a Sony digital recorder.  We did not talk during the taping as we were just looking to see if we could even pick up any road noise.  Sure enough we picked up all the road noise, the turn signal used to turn into the driveway, the difference in the road noise between the main road and the driveway, all the sounds of turning off the engine and opening and closing our doors.  We were in an SUV for our tests.

  What we also find very interesting is the photographic evidence above.  If Steve was the first person at the gate, as he states when he is pulling up, that the gate looks like it is locked, why is the first car in this picture a Gloucester County Sheriff's Office patrol vehicle?  Also, how could Steve see the gate with this patrol vehicle in the way?  Super human powers?  So just within the first thirty seconds alone, we see evidence that Steve Baranek started manufacturing false evidence.  He was not driving in a vehicle as he would have others believe.  That means everything beyond the first thirty seconds is without question garbage.  It's meaningless.  Has no use and no value.  The moment Steve Baranek started recording was a complete sham.    And still we have so much more on this.

Gloucester, VA Links and News.  GVLN Website.