It was
estimated that somewhere in the neighborhood of just over 300 people
showed up for this event with several people having traveled several
hours to do so. Most of the people who attended were what are often
referred to as conservative in nature. Not right wing even though
some may take that credit, we understand what the meaning of right
wing means today and what it used to mean. There is a substantial
difference between the past meaning and the present.
(Conservative: Meaning; 1 disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restoretraditional ones, and to limit change.
2.
cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate.
3.
traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservativesuit.
People who
care about their community and the future that we all seem to be
heading towards. People who are trying to do what they feel is right
and what is best for everyone and not just themselves. It is very
important that these distinctions be pointed out and made very clear.
Because our next concern is the content of the meeting that we are
about to address and it is going to offend the people who attended
this meeting. It's what we like to call;
Bait
And Switch:
Two main speakers
gave their views during the vast majority of the 3 hours allotted for
the meeting. Most of what they communicated, we would have to say,
we agreed with the majority of it. Climate change is nothing more
than a religion and has no real science behind it in the views of
many. Agenda 21 is a culmination of a multitude of concepts and
planning that is very quickly stripping away the rights of all
American's. Again, we do not disagree.
But now here is where we highly disagree with what
took place at this meeting. The tools, books, DVD's newsletters,
pamphlets, and more were all designed to make anyone who tries to use
these tools look like complete idiots. They are some of the least
professional, highly disturbing pieces of crap put together and the
folks at this meeting were told that to expect to be told that these
tools would not work but what the folks who are using them need to do
is go in groups and demand to know why politicians would not sign
them and demand that they be signed anyway. I looked at a bunch of
these forms myself and I would never sign them as they; ARE NOT IN
THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE!!!!!!
These two speakers, in our opinion, were very slick
Washington, DC con men leading good people down a very dangerous and
narrow path. These jokers tell a great story, and they have a very
conservative pitch which is what makes them so appealing to a certain
class of people, but it does not appear that the people are really
looking at the end game of these jokers.
One of the tools that was given to the people at this
meeting is called a “Resolution To Protect Citizen's Property
Rights”, which must be read very very carefully. What it boils
down to is the full shut down of planning by anyone in the county if
anyone in any county could ever get this insane document signed by
their county officials. If county officials did ever sign and agree
to this, then the state would have to come in and take over the
planning and the state is not going to sign any document like this
nor give any bearing to one signed by county officials. It's dead
from the very start because no county official would ever sign it.
Besides, it would also be thrown out of court should it ever make it
that far. No judge would ever uphold the document in our view.
What those who attended the meeting were told is to
expect that county officials would not sign it, but not to accept
that issue and keep fighting it anyway, not being told the real
nature of why no county official would ever sign. That makes the
group of folks trying to push something like this through look like a
bunch of nuts. Well, if they did not read the document and
understand how nuts the document is, then they are a bunch of nuts.
AHHA! We start to see how these jokers work and how it very much
appears they are working against the folks they profess to be trying
to help.
Next on our list of nutty goof ball ideas spreading
around the meeting came from the Virginia Christian Alliance. We do
mean nutty goof ball ideas. Here is what this one is about.
Petition
For Impeachment of Attorney General
Mark
Herring:
First, the document is under a 2013 copyright by the
Virginia Christian Alliance, strike one. We are going to make a copy
of this that will be watermarked for news use only, therefore
allowing us to make a copy to show everyone the document. This
petition only states that the folks who signed the petitions want
Mark Herring impeached. The reason? Good question. It isn't very
clear. It's a bunch of mumbo jumbo concepts and no real reason
actually stated. Only opinions are given as to why Mark Herring
should be impeached. Yeah, I would worry about a petition like that.
No, not really. It has no chance of happening. It only sounds good
to those upset by the Gay Marriage ban being lifted.
No law is cited that Mark broke and no law is cited
that Mark has failed to uphold. No chance of the petition having any
chance of doing anything. It's a farce and a waste of time with the
exception of seeing who the dissidents are who were willing to sign
such a petition. For that part, it's rather valuable.
Now there is also the free copy of the magazine they
were giving away, not worth the price of free. Again, it has a very
conservative style writing to it on the surface. When you actually
dig down and look at what they are writing about and how they are
choosing their articles, it's not so conservative. It's more
conservative socialism or conservative fascism or conservative
communism. It is not conservative capitalism however. The magazine
is titled, “New American”, which says it all.
We prefer the old style American ways of the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Not the fascist conservative
right wing. Again, there lies more issues, the people at this
meeting were not what anyone would call fascists or socialists or
communists by any means. They were old fashioned and were brought up
and taught a much different America than what is presently taught.
When polled, I do not recall seeing anyone raise their hands when it
was asked if there was anyone in the audience under the age of 40.
Everyone in the audience was 40 plus years and older. A different
form of education at a very different level.
The Fight:
What people were told where they must take a stand and
narrow their focus is on property rights. We have to ask, what good
are property rights if all other rights are taken away? The right to
privacy, the right to a fair trial, the right to keep and bear arms
and on and on...... Eventually your property rights can be taken
away once all your other rights are taken away from you.
You can protect your property rights by protecting all
of your rights and demanding that local, state and national
governmental bodies adhere to the United States Constitution and the
Bill of Rights, or the State Constitution and the state Bill of
Rights, if your state happens to have those. You watch everything
your government officials do. You ask a lot of questions and hold
representatives accountable for their actions.
You ignore these traveling road show, slick
Washington, DC hucksters, who talk a nice talk but lead you down the
wrong roads in our view.
We will be bringing you the entire meeting on YouTube
once it's all finished. It's 3 hours worth of meeting time. We are
going to break the entire meeting up into 3 segments. It's several
days worth of work on our part. We will also be showing you their
documents as well. We will once again go over all the areas that are
wrong with these documents. It was not a waste of time attending the
meeting, but it sure was a major disappointment.
In
Conclusion:
Beware the Agenda 21 protesters. It's not so much
what they are fighting for is wrong, but it is heavily misguided.
These are honest hard working folks who are trying to protect not
only their own rights, but the rights of everyone. The issues are
that they have been given tools that do not work by people whom, in
our opinion, do not want their tools to work, and are designed to
make conservative people look like fools. It is for reasons like
this that many in our own organization are not Republicans nor
Democrats, nor Libertarians, nor socialists nor communists or belong
to any political party. It's become a complete fools game that we
all refuse to play. So we beat all of them up here on this site with
equal fervor.
From Jim Marrs: Rule by Secrecy, Perennial Books,
Page 98;
“The objectives of the IPS, (Institute for Policy
Studies), came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round
Table.... one of the most notable being to create the “New Left”
as a grassroots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and
unrest and spread chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate
the “Ideas” of left-wing nihilistic socialism, support
unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the “Big Stick”
with which to beat the United States political establishment.
(Nihilism: Denial of all reality; rejection of all religious and
moral principles: Opposition to all constituted authority or
government).
Another goal of the IPS stated, “the dismantling of
all economic, political, social, and cultural institutions in the
United States”. All of this is done while maintaining a facade of
a liberal scholarly research center.”
It would appear that there are much larger forces at
work than Agenda 21. How hard is it to undermine the opposition when
invited right through the front door? Agenda 21 is a United Nations
document that people are being suckered into fighting against, which
means they are accepting UN mandates. Why would anyone fight the UN
when we should be fighting for our Constitutional Rights as well as
our Bill of Rights which by US law, has no higher authority?
Instead the questions should be asked, who elected any
of the United Nations officials and or politicians to begin with,
and what charter are they working from, under what authority?
Our notes to those who attended the meeting and are
now reading this article; Please note that right wing no longer
means what it once did nor does conservatism. There are no names now
for those of us from the old school. We no longer fit in the
paradigm of the new political system and that is by design. This is
partially what causes such great grief in so many older people in
this nation today. Most do not understand that the meanings of words
have dramatically been altered without your knowledge or consent.
Isn't that what your parents told you when you were young about the
way you were using words? Gay once meant happy. Cool once referred
to the weather outside. Groovy, what the hell? The term “man”
referred to a male person and not a general answer to everything and
to everyone. The list is very long on how we accepted and changed
the meaning of words without our parents consent or knowledge. Now
we are under the same issues our parents once faced with the meanings
of words.
