Showing posts with label Gloucester. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gloucester. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

The Waterline At Page Middle School: Disaster Waiting To Happen Here Too?

The new 16” waterline extending along T.C. Walker Road and installed as part of constructing Page Middle School, does not seem to have been installed in the proper location. Apparently when VDOT required changes to design drawings for improvements of the T.C. Walker Road and Route 17 intersection, those changes were not incorporated into the civil site and utility drawings. This failure has resulted in the 16” waterline now being located in the very bottom of the VDOT drainage ditch.
As the story goes; the contractor installed the waterline and then began constructing the drainage ditch. As they constructed the ditch they discovered they removed most of the dirt above the waterline. Instead of removing the waterline and reinstalling it in the correct location when the error was discovered, they excavated along side of and under the waterline, removing the stone bedding and dirt from under the pipe while it was still put together. 

Once the stone and dirt are removed from under the waterline it will sag downward. The more it is forced to sag, the more each connection joint in the line separates. This is a dangerous and unacceptable method of lowering a waterline that operates under pressure. The reliability of the gaskets used to seal each joint and the chances of every joint being completely home (fitted all the way together) become compromised when manipulated in such a manner. 

The required stone bedding under the pipe is also compromised and often completely ignored when utilizing such method. Another reason to avoid such method of adjusting waterline depth is it rarely results in achieving the required depth. A significant section of the new waterline does not come close to having the required amount of cover. On August 20, 2015 I used a four foot long probe rod to determine the amount of cover over the waterline and discovered areas with less than two feet of cover. The minimum cover requirement is generally three feet. The main reasons for minimum cover requirements are to protect the waterline from freezing and to limit pipe movement, thus preventing the pipe from blowing apart under pressure. The close proximity of the waterline to the water tower that supplies it, the fact that the pipe dead ends so close to the incorrectly covered pipe and that flow through the pipe will basically cease daily during each day’s coldest periods, during weekends and during other times the school is closed during winter months, are all very good reasons for not accepting the waterline in it’s current condition. The waterline in its current condition will also increase the chance of VDOT damaging it during ditch maintenance.

 If VDOT should damage the line, they will be exempt from responsibility as prescribed by the Code of Virginia and all liability will fall on Gloucester taxpayers. If, for any reason, the waterline blows apart so close to the water tower supplying it, the results would be catastrophic; most likely resulting in a significant portion of T.C. Walker Road and the entrance to Page being washed away before the water could be turned off. Page would be closed until water could be restored and the road and entrance repaired. In this scenario Gloucester taxpayers will also assume liability.
I know everyone wants the new school opened as currently scheduled, but this serious issue should not be ignored or dismissed for the sake of opening on time. It should also not be dismissed to save a buck, no matter whose buck it is.
Respectfully and just my 2 cents worth,
Kenneth E. Hogge, Sr.



The two above pictures shows where we were out measuring where and how deep the waterline is buried by Page Middle School.  

Mr. Hogge,


Schools and the Contractor are very well aware of the waterline issue and have committed to making the needed repairs during the Winter Break in December. Not only has the Contractor’s President issued a guarantee to the County for the repair, but we also continue to hold a performance bond on the Contractor to ensure the repairs are made to satisfaction. Public Utilities is aware of the Contractors commitment and finds the repair strategy to be acceptable.

Thank you for your support. Have a nice day.





John E.Hutchinson


Sunday, September 6, 2015

Page Middle School, Serious Life Threatening Concerns To Consider



















Above is a close up picture of the fence at the back or front of the building where the buses will be dropping off children at the new Page Middle School.  Children are going to want to play on and try to climb these fences.  With the top the way it is, we can see some serious issues coming up where some of the children will potentially get hurt.  Well, you can say, keep the children off the fences and make it a penalty for playing on them.  That's what any good person would think who never had children.  Children are going to be children.  Any penalty here should go against the school, not the children for such a poor design.  This is the very least of the issues we have seen at the new school.


Here is a scene when you go through what most would consider the front of the school, not where buses will be dropping off the children.  The staircase is okay, but look at the top of the stairs.  That is a wide open floor plan between the first floor and the second floor and it is very extensive.  The rail to protect the children is only 3 feet high.  Nothing else to protect anyone from anything.

  Now again, children are going to be children.  Lets see what we can expect with this type of open floor plan.  From the second floor, Johnny is going to want to see his new paper airplane can really fly.  Jimmy will want to see if he can hit Bobbie on the first floor with a piece of balled up paper from the second floor.    Oh and this is just the potential for mild mischief.  Now Madison and Billy do not get along, so while walking down this corridor, Madison comes up behind Billy and takes his bookbag and tosses if off the second floor where it accidently hits little Alison in the head forcing her head into the wall where she is knocked out and has to go to the hospital.  (Pray something like this never happens.)

  Or two children get into a fight by the rails and one or both go over.  Will any of them survive?  In my own opinion, this is a premeditated design disaster.

Wait, it gets worse.


Now take a look at these lockers.  The top of the lockers are at an even match for the top of the rails.  Anyone envisioning a child standing on top of the lockers and playing around?  Way to close to the edge of a very long fall.


This is the view of what is below.  Open education?



Here are some better views of the open corridor from the second floor where the middle school children will be walking everyday.

I walked through this school with an engineer who was mortified by what he saw.  A question that has been brought to my attention is how did the school board manage to get a certificate of occupancy especially when there are no visible escape routes and or facilities for handicapped children that might be on the second floor?  None.  Only item seen was one elevator which during a fire, can not be used according to what we know of fire codes.





If a fire should engulf the front of the building, the children will be locked in an outdoor courtyard that is fully fenced in with locked gates trapping them from being able to get out to safety.  Who designs these buildings?


At least the folks of the school board did think of one escape route that doubles as a king of the hill playground.  That massive dirt pile there might just be the escape route when the area floods.  You know those rising sea levels are unpredictable.  (HEHEHEHEE!)


Now someone from the School Board managed to get channel 13 out to cover the open house day at Page.  I wonder if anyone from the news crew noticed any of these issues?  Did they report on any of the potential issues for the incoming students?  No?  



Now I will give it that the new gym looks pretty nice but lacks bleachers for games against other schools or is competition dead?  My question is who are these workout machines for?  Please do not tell me these are for the children.  Their muscles are not ready for hard core training like this from what I understand.  This is even to high end for high school.  So is this for the teachers at taxpayer expense?  





Other issues well noted was the tremendous waste of space everywhere throughout the building.  Poor planning.  With all the wasted space and all the open areas up through the second floor, that also creates massive heating and cooling issues that is not really a big deal since its the taxpayers who are paying for it all anyway.  Ya gotta love that.  You are stuck with the bills for someone else's carelessness in design and others who approved that carelessness.  Or was it carelessness?  Nah, they just know its your money they are spending so it does not mean anything to them.

Approved by your local school board and probably the state Board of Education.  The same people in charge of our children's education and our future.  Oh, now that is just embarrassing. 

https://goo.gl/photos/8reFUmCLkGSnjw5a6  You can see more photos of the school at this link.

Route 17 Accident August 26th, 2015 - Photos










Due to computer issues we have had a major delay on getting these pictures up on this site of an accident that happened on route 17 South on August 26th, 2015 at about 2:00 PM.  We had all the photos up that same day, but our system started locking up due to an Adobe update virus.

  The accident started at the end of the Tidewater motel or beginning of the property known as the Salvation army.  The above Toyota Camery was traveling south on 17 at about the speed limit when a another vehicle traveling north on 17 decided to make a U turn and from what we understand, stopped in the middle of the highway.  The other vehicle is described as a white SUV.  That SUV was in the way of oncoming traffic which from what we understand caused the Camery to swerve off to the right shoulder to avoid hitting the white SUV.

  The driver hit multiple signs and the ditch caused the car to flip from what we can tell multiple times eventually landing on its side.  The driver of the SUV drove away leaving the scene of the accident but not before a witness took pictures of the SUV and from what we understand got the vehicle's plate.

  The drive of the Camery did not appear hurt despite how bad the accident looks.  We spoke with him and he seemed fine at that time.  But with any accident, sometimes injuries do not show up until later.  We have no updates on his condition since that time.

https://goo.gl/photos/ZXnxkei9JUZHtL4x9

The above link is to the entire photo series we have on the vehicle accident.  Over 100 pictures.

Utilities Yard In Bad Shape?


We keep hearing about how awful the conditions are at the utilities yard are and we seem to keep seeing evidence of it everywhere.  The guy above is seen at Hardee's at breakfast time because there just isn't any decent place at work to eat or even sit for the most part at the utilities yard.  

  The county can give away your tax dollars to private businesses but can not take care of its own infrastructure?  Or it's employees?  That is just embarrassing.  

Friday, July 31, 2015

Poor Landfill Deal

In the early 1990’s Gloucester’s elected leaders and paid staff made the decision to open a landfill that would receive trash from numerous localities including some in other states. Those leaders and staff made a deal with Waste Management of Virginia to allow them to operate the new landfill for 20 years under a self extending contract based on the landfill’s remaining capacity. At that time Gloucester taxpayers completely funded the ever rising costs to operate the old county landfill, so the picture painted for the taxpayers back then and even today is one of not having to raise taxes to fund trash disposal. Such service does have significant value to the taxpayers, but the questions is; did the leaders and staff back then make a good deal? Information on contracts of similar landfill operations in neighboring communities obtained under FOIA suggests a very poor deal was made on behalf of Gloucester taxpayers. The following are just a few examples of how bad the deal is.
 
Gloucester’s deal included monthly payments to the County of $.50 per ton for all waste received from outside of Gloucester. That rate has grown to a whopping $.83 in 23 years. Other Counties are getting $2.00 to $10.00 per ton. Gloucester receives no royalties from electricity generated by the abundantly growing and long term supply of methane gas produced from trash decomposition. Other neighboring Counties are getting a royalty of 10% of all gross profits from the sale of such electricity. Other Counties are getting 25% of net profits derived from recycling.Gloucester gets nothing. The loss to Gloucester taxpayers in these areas annually is likely over a million dollars.
 
Currently some of our elected leaders and paid staff assert thatGloucester’s benefit from the landfill deal comes from the trash convenience centers and being able to dispose of trash for free. They claim any increase in tonnage fees and such being paid to the County will result in Gloucester residents paying for trash disposal. This does not appear to stand up under scrutiny, as the other counties that made better deals have as many or more convenience centers and are also able to dispose of trash for free. Again, these are just a few examples of how badGloucester’s landfill deal is. Our elected leaders should seriously consider bringing Waste Management back to the negotiation table and work out a better deal. Increased revenue from the landfill could be used to build a couple of new libraries so the County stops wasting over a quarter million dollars every year to rent two libraries. There are many things that can be accomplished with increased revenue from the landfill and savings derived from owning our own libraries instead of leasing them.

Convenience Centers
 
Sussex County has 7 plus 1 at landfill
 
Amelia County has 6 plus 1 at landfill.
 
Charles City County has 2 plus 1 at landfill.
 
City of Hampton has 1 in Newport News.
 
Gloucester County has 4 plus 1 at landfill.
 
 
Recycling
 
Amelia County receives 25% of net profits.
 
Charles City County receives payment to cover expenses of recycling
                                 program not performed by Waste Management.
 
 
Gas Generation
 
Amelia County gets a royalty equal to 10% of the gross revenue from
                         any sale.
Charles City County gets a royalty equal to 10% of the gross revenue
                                 from any sale.
 
 
Inspections and Sampling
 
Amelia County gets $120,000 annually
 
Charles City County has $225,000 fund established and replenished
                                 annually by Waste management.
 
Gloucester County gets $77,087 annually.
 
 
Revenue
 
City of Hampton made $1.6 million in 2014.
 
Charles City County plans on $1.3 to $1.5 million annually.
 
Sussex County made $4.8 million in 2014
 
Gloucester County’s 2016 budget estimate of revenue from
                                  landfill rent is a sorry $263,406……..

Kenneth E. Hogge, Sr.
Gloucester PointVirginia