Gloucester Animal Control Evidence of Fraud?

Back in May of 2010, the Crews residence was illegally raided and an illegal search warrant was used as part of that raid.  The evidence is right here.  This is the back end of that search warrant.  How do we know its illegal?  Simple, the name on the execution and return are that of Stephen T Baranek, who at that time was a deputy Animal Control officer.  Animal Control can not under Virginia code, ever, serve or execute a search warrant.  The front was issued and signed by Gloria Owens who is a deputy clerk of the circuit court.  But the case was held in District Court.  What business did a circuit court clerk have in district court business?  Also, a circuit court clerk can not at anytime issue a search warrant in the Commonwealth of Virginia.  Yet we have shown that Gloucester has done just that.

Again, you see that the search warrant here is issued by Gloria Owens, Deputy Clerk of the Gloucester Circuit Court.  Search Warrants can only be issued by Judges or Magistrates.  Also, read how broad the search warrant is written.  Search Warrants must be very specific as to whom and or what is to be searched and or seized.  A broad search warrant is illegal.  Also note, there is no court stamp for the date of issue.  Only for the date of return.  How many violations can we find here?  

  I only recently received permission to publish this information and we are now showing all the dirt on this case.  

Above is one of the pictures taken by an Animal Control deputy showing Laura Crews to the far left with her hands behind her back because they arrested her.  They did not have a search warrant at that time like they claim in the court report.  The only thing the Crews family ever received was a copy of the front page.  I had to fight the county for over a month under FOIA to get the majority of the rest of it.  It took Congressman Rob Wittman's office to step in and force the county to provide that information which was not completed to my request.

  The picture screen shot above also shows the meta data on the camera used and the time and date the picture was taken.  They had no real cause to take her into custody.  It was an illegal raid from every area I have looked at.  What was the motive?  Land and animal theft is what we have uncovered as some of the reasons for the raid.  

Look at the ground around this bathtub.  It is wet.  On the outer rim it is very dry.  It had not rained in over 10 days during that period and we have confirmed that based on weather history sites for this area.  That tub was filled with water and Animal Control as well as several Sheriff's deputies were conspiring to create fraudulent evidence against Laura Crews and stated in court, the animals had no water.  Well of course they had no water when Animal Control and Sheriff's deputies drain it all out from the various areas around the property.

Mike Soberick never argued these facts.  Attorney Mike Soberick never argued the illegal search warrant.  This guy has now been promoted to a Judge.  Commit fraud get a promotion?  Typical in Gloucester.  Judge Shaw who had to also see the illegal search warrant and had heard the case has gone from District Court Judge to Circuit Court Judge.  What a wonderful reward system.  Illegally convict people and get a promotion for doing such?  Really?    

And its all thanks to this guy right here.  Steve Baranek of Gloucester, Virginia Animal Control.

Related articles

• The Gloucester, Virginia Legal Case That Never Happened?
• Gloucester, VA - FOIA and Private Email Accounts In Virginia

The Gloucester, Virginia Legal Case That Never Happened?

The gloucester, va case that never was from Chuck Thompson

It has been overheard that some Gloucester officials claim that the above case never happened.  Well, its kind of hard to deny the evidence of the court report from that case.  A case where the defendant Laura Fielder Crews was railroaded by the courts and if you will take the time to read the 96 pages here, will note with great interest that she was never allowed to speak on her own behalf.

  This record comes from what was supposed to only be a hearing and defendant's husband was removed from the court as well as everyone else so the court actors could pull a very fast and dirty deal here from what I understand of the case.  They changed the hearing to a trial without notice to anyone including the defendant and at the end they forced her into a plea deal.  I was not a witness to this part of the case.  I have read the above transcript many times and anyone who reads it has to ask, at what point was Mike Soberick, now Judge Soberick, defending his client?  Looks like he threw her under the bus and was opening up major gaps for the prosecution.

  But again, according to some Gloucester Officials, this case never happened.  So where did this legal document come from if the case never happened?  Please folks someone is trying to hide dirty laundry in my view.  But is this all the evidence?  Not by a long shot.

Mike Soberick Case That Never Happened from Chuck Thompson

After the charade of a case was over, the defendant went to Mike Soberick's office to get copies of the files.  Well that is when Mike's secretary told the defendant that there were no files and that she must be mistaken as Mike Soberick could not have defended her.  (I have him on video showing he was their attorney that has never been publicly published as of yet).  We have a great deal of this case published on one of our sister sites.  The sister site is dedicated to this case and is over 20 sections with a great deal of detail of the absolute corruption that took place in my view.

  Again, based on my research on every aspect of this case, the entire case was predicated on fraud at every level is my opinion.  For some reason, these folks think they can do the same again, against this defendant having been successful in the past.  One of the many ways to defend against these folks is to show the world what they are doing, what they have done and what the actual evidence shows.  Never hesitate to expose them at every level and name every name.

  Post it, publish it.  Expose every little detail of the case for everyone to see.  Hide nothing.  Let them defend against the real truth once its shown to everyone.  Watch them all squirm when you talk to them about it.  Why?  Because this case never happened.  We have so much evidence of this case, but they will still tell you it's all fabricated and not true.  And here is some major evidence to help them out with their story.  Right down to Mike Soberick's own signature.  Major parts of the evidence against them comes from them and is their own evidence.  How does that work out for them?  Like the picture at the top of the post here.  It's their own picture after they raided the property listed in the record.  They call the defendant crazy because they have a lot to hide.  I am not hiding any area of this case.  Everyone is welcome to see every aspect of it.  Ask all the questions you want.  Illegal search warrants and all.

Illegal Search Warrant, Virginia ??? from Chuck Thompson

Wait, I did say something above about an illegal search warrant now didn't I?  I thought so.  Well here it is.  This was posted on the defendant's property after they took the defendant to jail and she never saw it until she came home the next day and found it posted on her property.  The above is all the defendant had for several years.  I had to do a FOIA request to get the rest that was supposed to be there and still never got everything I asked for.

  Let's go over the above warrant to see why I believe its illegal.  It was signed by a deputy court clerk without any authorization at the time they ever proved, by any magistrate or judge.  (They still have never proved it was authorized by anyone other than the court deputy clerk).  She marked the warrant she signed as though she was a magistrate.  That is issue number one.  Number two.  Both the US as well as the Virginia Constitutions make it very clear that broad search warrants can never be created and issued.  The search warrants must be very specific as to whom and what is to be searched and it must be based on evidence by an independent witness who attests to the authenticity of their own statements and they must be willing to testify in court which never happened.

  The above warrant is very broad.  It does not specify anything other than the entire property and demands the confiscation of property that would not even be considered evidence of any form of a crime.  But this is what one can expect here in Gloucester County, Virginia.  The land of the life worth living.  At least that is what they try and tell us.  But again I am only giving my opinion on the case that never happened according to some Gloucester County, Virginia officials.  We took this case all the way up to Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli who was to busy with his campaign for Governor to be bothered with it.  Hell of a guy.  Sorry he lost the race.  That's sarcasm.  Still a great deal more to come.

  Oh and one more thing?  Where in the search warrant does it say that the defendant was to be arrested?  She was arrested during this raid and I can't find a valid reason as to why other than unsubstantiated claims that get rebuked by various witnesses in the court documents from the prosecution.  How does that work?  That's right.  The prosecution's own witnesses testify against each other and no one catches it?  Really?  Who are they kidding?  Read closely how the defense attorney gives the prosecutions witnesses free passes and even helps them with their case.   But again, that is simply my opinion on the case that never happened.  

Related articles

• Capias Fraud In Gloucester, Virginia?
• Outrageous Court Order by Judge Sward of Portsmouth Virginia
• Why did the Attorney General change the Commonwealth's legal position in Bostic v. Rainey?
• Dr Walter Reed and Yellow Fever, Gloucester, Virginia History
• Gloucester, VA Civil War History, Discourse To The Troops
• Virginia Under The Stuarts, 1607-1688 Ebook

Middlesex , VA - Beware The Enemy Within!

English: The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution Česky: Originál Listiny práv, prvních deseti dodatků k Ústavě Spojených států amerických Deutsch: Die Bill of Rights genannten ersten zehn Zusatzartikel zur US-amerikanischen Verfassung, die den Bürgern bestimmte Grundrechte garantieren Español: La Carta de Derechos de los Estados Unidos, el término por el que se conocen las diez primeras enmiendas de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos de América (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Beware; The Enemy Within!

September, 2013, Middlesex County Board of Supervisor, Carlton Revere announced at the board meeting that prayer was being suspended due to fears from a recent litigation case that occurred in Pittsylvania, VA, where that county's board of supervisors were sued for starting their board meetings with an opening prayer.  A direct assault on the first amendment of the Bill of Rights attached to the United States Constitution that is the right of every American regardless of government office.  We reported on the original Pittsylvania case on this site.

Article One of the Bill of Rights reads as follows;

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Chairman Carlton Revere was following the advice of the Middlesex county attorney, Mike Soberick.  Mr Soberick is supposed to be in the position of protecting the county and it's citizens from an entire host of issues to include unfair attacks against the freedoms of the county's own citizens.  Instead Mike Soberick caves to the will of some sickofant fringe group that goes by the name, "Freedom From Religion Foundation", who supposedly sent the county an email from the foundation's staff attorney.

  Everyone can look and see that even the United States Congress opens it's meetings with prayer.  How is it that counties are being attacked for what Congress practices in front of the media everyday?  Stopping the sickofant fringe groups from attacking the rights of the people is real simple.  Force them to sue every county in every state to try and stop our freedoms.  This would quickly force these fringe groups into bankruptcy.  

  As noted above in the first amendment to the Constitution, freedom of religion, speech and the press is all under one umbrella for a reason.  They are all intertwined and the same.  You take away one, you take away all of them.  It's a direct attack on the American People as a whole by a minority that wants to dominate your very thoughts and dictate all your actions.  It's anarchistic.

Thomas Jefferson:  "Of liberty then I would say that, in the whole plenitude of it's extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will, but rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.  I do not add "within the limits of law," because law is often but the tyrant's will and always so when it violates the rights of an individual."

  In other words, the folks at the "Freedom From Religion Foundation", are very clearly obstructing the rights of their fellow citizens as defined by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

  Further;  It is a time tested and well proven fact that prayer before meetings is a natural deterrent to violence during the meeting and a positive influence to the proper flow of said meetings.  

  That would mean the folks over at the Freedom From Religion Foundation have opened up the county of Middlesex to potential violence and anarchy and that the county attorney, Mike Soberick, has facilitated this action of his own will and against the citizens of the county at which we would recommend that the citizens of Middlesex county seek the fair removal, for just cause,  of any further services and or dis services of this spineless weezle of a county attorney.

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.  In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness-these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.  The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and cherish them.  A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity.  Let it simply be asked, Where is security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice?  And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.  Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." 

George Washington

   Again we say, Beware The Enemy Within!

King James Version of the Bible from Chuck Thompson

http://www.putlocker.com/public/XkLkYurjYyisZuT6p2v6XOeZZ2v6XEekZuXkZtUSJHidKIU5TNrrDyGdTOP0WNLjXOPkTOP2ZuX2ZuB1TNvtZ30

We are always giving away free digital copies of bibles.  We have numerous versions on our e-book page.  The link above allows a free PDF file download of the King James Version.  You can also download a copy from our slideshare site as well.  We offer other file versions on our e-book page so take a look around.

  You have the right to your opinion to what you feel is in your best interest to believe in or not believe in.  We fully respect that.  You also have a right to ignore the fact that we give away bibles and we have no issues with that.  You do not have the right to violate our rights and freedoms and we will defend that.

Related articles

• Gloucester, VA Speaking for.....
• Governor McDonnell Announces 120 New Jobs in City of Danville
• Criminal Prosecutions
• Gloucester, VA School Information You Didn't Know