Gloucester, Virginia Zoning For Horses: None By Federal Law

Now here is a very interesting case that was brought up before the Board of Supervisors and we just covered this issue in an earlier post tonight, but the issue involves zoning for horses in Gloucester County.  Well zoning only applies to county owned land.  Not to anyone with a farm, business, or personal use.  The county has no legal say whatsoever in this matter, yet, are trying to state that they do.  You have no obligation at any time to ask for permission to do anything here in the county or anywhere in the 48 states of the Union.  (We know there are 50 states, but you better look up some facts on who the Constitution actually applies to).  The claims made by Ted Wilmot simply are not true based on the information below.

Again, let's look at those laws:

"ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED 
California Law prohibits Cities and Counties from enforcing City or County Codes and Ordinances upon property that is not OWNED by the City or County even if the property is within City limits.

California Penal Code: Chapter 5b CITATIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF COUNTY, CITY, OR CITY AND COUNTY ORDINANCES Sections 853.1through 853.4 was repealed in 1967.

The Supreme Court ruled that Municipalities cannot exert any acts of ownership and control over property that is not OWNED by them, see Palazzolo v. Rhode Island 533 US 606, 150 L.Ed. 2d 592, 121 S.Ct. ___(2001) (no expiration date on the taking clause for City's illegal enforcement of its Codes on the man's private property and restricting the man's business), affirming both Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 US 1003, 120 L.Ed. 2d 798 (1992).(butterfly activists and Code Enforcement cannot restrict development of the man's private swampland unless they lawfully acquire the land FIRST, surveying with binoculars constitutes a "takings"), and Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes, 526 US 687 (1999), 143 L.Ed. 2d 882 S.Ct.____ (1998).

In the Monterey case, the California private property owner was awarded $8 million for Code Enforcement's illegal trespass and restriction of his business, and another $1.45 million for the aggravation of a forced sale.

Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."

Black's Law Dictionary 5 th Edition (page 1140): Recaption. At Common Law, a retaking or taking back. 

Now even though California law is cited here, it is applicable throughout all 48 contiguous states of the union.  Ted Wilmot does not know the law?  Whomever brought the charges against these people should be sued to no end.  Each county employee involved should be sued as a private individual as well as the county in our opinion.  Again, the audacity of these folks is unreal.   Please note the amount the man sued for and won.  The county needs to be taken to task on this outrageous invasion of the people the county brought to court.  The massive invasion of their rights is unconscionable.

  Now what is truly sad is the fact that the people who are in court over this, their own attorney does not even know this nor tried to look it up.  What does that say about their own legal council?  You need to hire an attorney why?  Ever?  Good luck with that.

But as we like to state, none of this should ever be construed as legal advice.  You can only get legal advice from a Franchised Bar attorney which we have not bought into the Bar franchise nor are we even interested in doing so.  So for franchised legal advice, please see a franchised legal consultant known as an attorney.  We only discuss lawful concepts which everyone has a right to do as that right is inherent and unalienable.  No license required.  In fact, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, it's the people who make the laws, not the government.  If you question that, please see the Commonwealth Constitution.  

  Those codes that the legislature churns out is only the color of law.  If it were law, it would say it was law.  Instead, they are statutes, codes and or ordinances.  That is not law.  Those codes, ordinances and or statutes really do not apply to you.  They apply to a person.  Who is a person?  An actor who wears a mask.  

  Who are the true actors?  Government employees.  Most folks are wrongfully charged and do not even know it and get thrown in jail, prison, or charged with crimes they did not actually commit.  And you thought maybe something was wrong with the system?  Yes there is.

The Official State Office Known As Person 

The above document is free to download from our SlideShare site.  It explains who a person is.  We verified the definition of a person through the Oxford dictionary as well as the Catholic Dictionary.  An actor who wears a mask.  If it was meant to be against a man or a woman, the codes, statutes and or ordinances would say so.  They clearly never do.  You have to ask why.  Or just learn the real definition.  Have you been fooled by the legal system?

Coming soon.  How to disqualify any judge or prosecuting attorney.  The legal term?  Recuse them.

Related articles

• Gloucester, Virginia Board of Supervisors Video With Notes On Law, Jan. 2015
• Gloucester, Virginia: Are You A Citizen?
• Bitcoin State of the Union, Podcast News Updates
• Three Virginia Schools Recognized for Outstanding Innovation in Physical Fitness
• The White House, Raise The Wage, This Is Too Funny!
• Is Monsanto Using 4-H to Brainwash Your Children About GMOs?

Gloucester, Virginia Board of Supervisors Video With Notes On Law, Jan. 2015

Video from the January 7th, 2015 Board of Supervisors meeting.  This is where the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust begged the Board for money and the board approved giving them their pleading.  Your tax dollars now working against you as now that money will be used to get others to beg from the Gloucester Main Street Preservation Trust to give up some of that money to them.

  This is how government and others conspire against the people.  They turn everything into a begging contest.  Let me explain.  In order to be considered, you must submit an application for various benefits.  Let's break that down.  Submit, submission, submissive.  To be under.  You apply to be under.  Hence you are begging.  Bet you never looked at it this way.  What did you think it meant?  Bet you never even thought about it since you are told to beg everyday for pretty much everything.

  Now this money is supposed to be used to generate pre qualified entrepreneurs.  Amazing.  They want people to beg for stuff they already have a right to do.  How is that working for everyone?  It's the same with a business license.  If you already have the right to contract, why do you need a business license?  You don't no matter what they tell you.  Zoning permits?  You already have the right, why are you asking for permission?  When you ask for permission, they have the right to say no or charge you a fortune to tell you yes when you already had the right?

  Your pocket is being picked and you are allowing it to happen to you.  Stop asking for permission for what you already have the right to do.  Those permits and licenses are for them, not for you.  Why are you paying?  Because you did not know any better.  When we challenged the county on all of this, they remained silent.  Why?  Because we already showed them through Federal Law we were right.

ENFORCEMENT OF CITY/COUNTY CODES PROHIBITED
California Law prohibits Cities and Counties from enforcing City or County Codes and Ordinances upon property that is not OWNED by the City or County even if the property is within City limits.

California Penal Code: Chapter 5b CITATIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF COUNTY, CITY, OR CITY AND COUNTY ORDINANCES Sections 853.1through 853.4 was repealed in 1967.

The Supreme Court ruled that Municipalities cannot exert any acts of ownership and control over property that is not OWNED by them, see Palazzolo v. Rhode Island 533 US 606, 150 L.Ed. 2d 592, 121 S.Ct. ___(2001) (no expiration date on the taking clause for City's illegal enforcement of its Codes on the man's private property and restricting the man's business), affirming both Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 US 1003, 120 L.Ed. 2d 798 (1992).(butterfly activists and Code Enforcement cannot restrict development of the man's private swampland unless they lawfully acquire the land FIRST, surveying with binoculars constitutes a "takings"), and Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes, 526 US 687 (1999), 143 L.Ed. 2d 882 S.Ct.____ (1998).

In the Monterey case, the California private property owner was awarded $8 million for Code Enforcement's illegal trespass and restriction of his business, and another $1.45 million for the aggravation of a forced sale.

Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."

Black's Law Dictionary 5 th Edition (page 1140): Recaption. At Common Law, a retaking or taking back.

We do not have to make any of this up.  Here it is right from the law books.  The county has no right to get involved in your business at any time for any reason.  You may also want to look up Hale vs Henkel, the government does not even have a right to ask you about your business and if they do, you have a right to tell them to go very far away and never come back.

http://freedom-school.com/law/stare-decesis-hale-v-henkel.html

The above is a link to one of the interpretations of the case.

Now let's talk a bit more about government corruption shall we?  If you own a small business and are collecting and paying sales tax, the question that must be asked is why?  Is the county or the state paying you to do this?  If they are not, you have been tricked into doing so thinking it is required.  It is not.  In fact, if they are not paying you to do this, you have a right to sue them.  They are in violation of the 13th amendment of the US Constitution.

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

  If you are not being paid to collect sales taxes, then what crime have you committed that makes you an involuntary slave to the government?  You can not just stop paying those taxes without penalties because you already agreed to a contract that you didn't understand.  It's called an adhesion contract.  But they will do everything to enforce that illegal contract down your throat.  You have to give them advanced notice that you will no longer be collecting or paying that sales tax.  You can sue them for back payments for your costs of collecting these taxes as well as not giving you full disclosure when they contracted you in their scheme.  Don't you just love the way the government operated these days?

  None of this is legal advice.  Only a Bar attorney can give you legal advice as they are franchised members of the franchised legal system having paid their annual franchise dues.  We discuss concepts of law here instead.  Everyone has a right to discuss concepts of law as it is an inherent right.

York Herald 2015 1-15, By Phil Bazzani 

The most recent issue of the York Herald by Phil Bazzani, York District Board of Supervisors for Gloucester County, Virginia.  Get his take on some of the issues or the avoidance thereof.  But most of them try to avoid many of the issues.  They have to or they end up with a great deal of liability.  Not that this is not already an issue anyway.  Just saying anything on the issues ups their liability however and they all know this so they all do everything they can to avoid it.

  

Related articles

• Gloucester, Virginia: Are You A Citizen?
• Can The American Flag Be A Threat? Yes, Say Judges
• The Truth About Your Birth Certificate?
• Even Knowing About This Law Might Prevent You From Serving On A Jury
• Here's What Inversions Are Costing Us
• Gloucester, VA Do You Need A License Plate On You Vehicle? Federal Law Says No. States Can Not Override?

Gloucester, Virginia: Are You A Citizen?

Citizen.  Are you one?  Are you sure?  What is in a title?  It may prove to be far more than you ever thought.  Has anyone ever looked up the legal definition of the word "Citizen"?  Maybe we should do just that.  Let's go to Black's Law and get that exact definition of what a "Citizen" is and then you can decide if you are one or not.

What is CITIZEN?

In general, A member of a free city or jural society, (civitas.) possessing all the rights and privileges which can be enjoyed by any person under its constitution and government, and subject to the corresponding duties.

Law Dictionary: What is CITIZEN? definition of CITIZEN (Black's Law Dictionary) 

Please take very close note that there is a separation between a citizen and a person and that a citizen falls "UNDER" any area's Constitution.  This means that the Constitution and the local laws, codes, statutes and ordinances are above you.  For a person, those laws are created by the "PERSON" for the benefit of the "PERSON" and the government.  A citizen is subject to taxes and every conceivable orders thrown at them.  In other words, a citizen has very limited rights.

  What is a person?  Let's go back to Black's law again.

  

What is NATURAL PERSON?

A human being, naturally born, versus a legally generated juridical person.

Law Dictionary: What is NATURAL PERSON? definition of NATURAL PERSON (Black's Law Dictionary) 

Wait.  What is a legally generated juridical person?  

What is JURIDICAL PERSON?

Entity, as a firm, that is not a single natural person, as a human being, authorized by law with duties and rights, recognized as a legal authority having a distinct identity, a legal personality. Also known as artificial person, juridical entity, juristic person, or legal person. Also refer to body corporate.

Law Dictionary: What is JURIDICAL PERSON? definition of JURIDICAL PERSON (Black's Law Dictionary) 

Well, I know that I am not a juridical person.  Or am I?  Is that what a Birth Certificate is?  Is that what a social security card is?  Is that what a drivers license is?  Are these juridical persons?  Is a juridical person subject to the same authority as a citizen?  Well, actually from what I can see, a juridical person has a few more rights than a citizen does, but is still rather limited and falls under more laws, codes, statutes and ordinances than a true natural person does.

  You won't be able to find the legal answers on the questions just above as far as Birth Certificates and other state or government ID's are concerned.  If you are a natural person though, the next question that comes up that you must ask is are you subject to codes, statutes, and or ordinances?  To answer that one is a very clear no.  At least not in the United States.  But you were never told this and it looks like a very serious game has been played against you without your knowledge.

  When you apply for a job, you are asked if you are a US Citizen.  When you go to the bank and want to open up an account, you are asked if you are a US Citizen.  Government applications always ask if you are a US Citizen.  They deny you access to jobs, banking, and more if you say no.  But it's a true statement if you are not a US Citizen.  You can not be refused a job if you state you are not a US Citizen and explain that you are a natural person.  But then you are not subject to personal taxes from your income.  Only a citizen has to pay taxes on income.

  That is where the game is played against you.  You consent to paying income taxes on your personal income because you confessed to being a US Citizen subject to the laws, statutes, codes and or ordinances placed over a citizen.  You must feel pretty foolish now allowing all that money to be taken out of your hands and away from your family because they played a little trick on you.  

  It has been proven over and over that taxes on your wages is voluntary if you are not a citizen.  If you are a citizen, the IRS can not prove they have the right to take any money from your wages and this too has been proven.  There are a lot of questions on other taxes such as sales taxes and certain property taxes.  The US Constitution seems to only have considered land taxes as the only taxable items held by any person.  Now we are still investigating what that means.  Is that taxes to be paid yearly or land transfer taxes only?  We are going through old records to learn this soon.

  So what is in a title?  Obviously more than one ever imagined.  Maybe it's time to reclaim our rights who are not citizens.  If you have a disdain for the Constitution, you are free to be a citizen.  We need taxpayers.

Related articles

• Governor McAuliffe Statement on Bostic v. Rainey Ruling
• Why did the Attorney General change the Commonwealth's legal position in Bostic v. Rainey?
• All I want for Christmas
• Open Letter to the Citizens of Gloucester County Virginia
• Virginia Attorney General; Private Law Firm For State Officials Only?
• Anti Federalist Papers No. 41-43B - Powers of The Constitution Continued