Gloucester County Forged
911 Call?
The above video has been
produced mainly for the audio recording that was used in a court of
law right here in Gloucester County, Virginia. This recording was
both submitted and accepted as evidence. The 911 operator, one Holly M Cohoon, even testified to it. Well if you have
played this once already, did you actually hear what was being said?
There are way too many issues with it to be authentic. It is our
professional opinion that this is a forged recording. You may want
to play this a few more times and listen carefully to the recording.
Before we go too far, I
must state that I have also altered this call in a slight way. I
removed a very tiny section where the caller states her address.
This was done to protect this party. Other than that, the call is
exactly what was played in a local court. So let's look at some of
the issues.
The caller to the 911
operator goes through at least five different emotions during a brief
one minute and 6 second call. Even in a mental institution,
the worst patients do not go through that many emotions in that fast
a period.
The 911 operator, Holly M Cohoon, tells
the caller not to shoot out the door. The caller never stated she
was even by a door. The 911 operator, Holly M Cohoon, does not state that once, but
instead she states it multiple times so you know she isn't making a
mistake.
In less than 40
seconds, the 911 operator, Holly M Cohoon, breaks every form of protocol and states
that there is already a sheriff's deputy outside. She does not radio for a
patrol car, she does not stop the conversation to verify that there
is a deputy outside. She flat out states it.
We had a 911 operator from
another area analyze this call and we were told that there was no way
it could possibly be authentic in their professional opinion, which matched our opinion.
Now this has everything to
do with what we have been reporting about. This does tie into the
reports of Gloucester County Officials ignoring our requests for
information and also our report on the search warrant. This call
took place on May 4th, 2010. Numerous off-duty sheriff's
deputies were all over the property. What alarmed the caller to the
911 operator was The fact that an unknown male called to the defendant's telephone screaming for the defendant/occupant of this home to get out of the house immediately. The reason was never stated. (Yes, we will show that a reason was never stated in a later article). What further alarmed the defendant/occupant was that when she looked out the window, she saw an unidentified intruder beating a dog in the front yard with a metal pipe.
The occupant of the home
hung up on the unidentified caller and called 911. There was no reason whatsoever for
anyone to be calling the occupant and ordering her to get out of the house.
Now this next part is only
what we have been told from a person inside the Gloucester County
Sheriff's Office and we have no way to prove it. In fairness, we
can only report what we were told. This was a "Fun Raid," ordered by
sheriff Steve Gentry. This "Fun Raid" had dual purposes. One, the
occupant of this home had made a complaint about members of the Gloucester Sheriff's Office via a letter to Steve Gentry. Two, the home
was within a certain demographic in that the owners/occupants were
known gun owners and in an upper economic bracket.
What we were told is the "Fun Raid" was for the
purpose of grabbing the guns and whatever cash and/or other valuables
could be easily taken. What went wrong? First, no one expected
anyone to be home in the house. Second, because the owners/occupants own
animals, Animal Control was called in to take over and legitimize the
so-called "search."
Okay, in all reality, that
seems pretty far fetched even for me to fully grasp. We were told by the person inside the Gloucester County Sheriff's Office that this is fairly common and the way they normally get away with it
is by creating a shoot-out with whomever the target is and killing
them. This particular victim lived --through a series of good luck and cooperating at the right times. Again, I have no way to verify these
statements made but it does make sense as to why the search warrant
is so sloppy and full of errors. It was produced during this event
to cover tracks is what we believe. It would also start to explain
why the 911 call, in our professional opinion, is forged.
Now if you really consider
this that hard to believe, we are nowhere near the end of the story.
It continues to get a lot worse and there is so much more.
![]()
