Thursday, September 19, 2013

Governor McDonnell Urges Virginians to “Go Teal” for Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month

English: A pathological specimen of ovarian ca...
English: A pathological specimen of ovarian carcinoma. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Executive Mansion to Display the Color Teal to Honor All Those Affected by Ovarian Cancer

RICHMOND – Governor Bob McDonnell and CancerDancer urge Virginians to “Go Teal” on Thursday, September 19, 2013 to raise awareness of ovarian cancer.  Virginians are encouraged to wear teal to honor those affected by ovarian cancer. 
  
            In honor of Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, the Executive Mansion will display teal ribbons throughout the day and be illuminated teal at night on Thursday, September 19, 2013.  CancerDancer will gather friends at 525 at the Berry Burk in Richmond at 6:00 p.m. tomorrow before walking to the Mansion.

            More than 21,000 American women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer each year and about 14,000 succumb to the disease.

            CancerDancer is a Richmond-based nonprofit celebrating the lives of those affected by ovarian cancer in an effort to educate, empower and stimulate research leading to a cure.  To learn more about CancerDancer, please visitwww.ocancerdancer.org/events.

View the governor’s proclamation here.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Media Buries Psychiatric Drug Connection to Navy Shooter

Fluoxetine (Prozac), an SSRI
Fluoxetine (Prozac), an SSRI (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Networks don’t want to risk losing $2.4 billion in ad revenue from
pharmaceutical giants;


Paul Joseph Watson
September 18, 2013

Despite every indication that Navy Yard gunman Aaron Alexis was on
SSRI drugs that have been linked to dozens of previous mass shootings,
the mainstream media has once again avoided all discussion of the
issue, preferring instead to blame the tragedy on a non-existent AR-15
that the gunman didn’t even use.

We now know that Alexis “had been treated since August by the Veterans
Administration for his mental problems.”

As Mike Adams points out, “This is proof that Aaron Alexis was on
psychiatric drugs, because that’s the only treatment currently being
offered by the Veterans Administration for mental problems. Alexis’
family members also confirmed to the press that he was being “treated”
for his mental health problems. Across the medical industry,
“treatment” is the code word for psychiatric drugging.”

Alexis also suffered from PTSD, blackouts and anger issues – all of
which are treated with SSRI drugs. The most common form of treatment
for PTSD is Paroxetine, which is listed as the number 3 top
violence-causing drug by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices
(ISMP).

The Navy Yard shooter was clearly on some form of psychiatric drug,
but the media has shown no interest in discovering its identity.

Despite it being reported that prescription drugs were found in the
apartment of ‘Batman’ shooter James Holmes days after the Aurora
massacre, it took nine months to find out exactly what those drugs
were. Like Columbine killer Eric Harris, Holmes had been taking
Zoloft, another SSRI drug linked with violent outbursts.

The length of time it took to find out that Holmes was on Zoloft was
partly because the media habitually shows zero interest in pursuing
the link between anti-depressants and violence.

As the website SSRI Stories profusely documents, there are literally
hundreds of examples of mass shootings, murders and other violent
episodes that have been committed by individuals on psychiatric drugs
over the past three decades. The number of cases is staggering.

Why is the corporate media so disinterested in pursuing this clear connection?

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that the pharmaceutical
giants who produce drugs like Zoloft, Prozac and Paxil spend around
$2.4 billion dollars a year on direct-to-consumer television
advertising every year. By running negative stories about prescription
drugs, networks risk losing tens of millions of dollars in ad revenue.

While failing to ask questions about what SSRI drugs Aaron Alexis was
taking prior to his rampage, the media instead blamed the shooting on
assault rifles, even after it had been confirmed that no AR-15 was
used by Alexis during the massacre.

FBI assistant director Victoria Parlave stated at a press conference
on Tuesday that authorities, “do not have any information at this time
that [Alexis] had an AR-15 in his possession.”

Despite there being no evidence that an AR-15 was used, the New York
Daily News ran a front page headline yesterday morning entitled, “Same
Gun Different Slay,” next to a picture of an assault rifle.

Hours after the FBI stated that no AR-15 had been used, MSNBC’s Alex
Wagner, who previously blamed the Boston bombings on Alex
Jones,continued to use an animated graphic depicting Alexis carrying
an assault rifle during the massacre.

Anti-second amendment crusader Piers Morgan also erroneously blamed
the shooting on “a man with a legally purchased AR-15, who just
committed the same kind of atrocity as we saw at Sandy Hook, and
Aurora,” during his CNN show on Monday.

CNN’s live news coverage also reported that Alexis had “recently
purchased (an) AR-15 shotgun,” when in fact that purchase had been
denied.

Both the New York Times and the Washington Post also falsely reported
that an AR-15 had been found on Alexis after the massacre.

DC gun grabbers Dianne Feinstein and Dick Durbin also regurgitated the
false claim that Alexis used an AR-15 during the rampage.

The US press has once again behaved like state media in the aftermath
of the Navy Yard shooting by pursuing the assault rifle angle –
despite the fact that it was patently false – in order to bolster the
White House’s gun control agenda.

In doing so, they have concurrently buried an integral aspect of mass
shootings that needs to be highlighted as part of a national conversation
– the clear connection between violent outbursts and SSRI drugs.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Attacks on Health Reporters and Their Readers Are Escalating

English: Cover of the book Take Control of You...
Take Control of Your Health by dr. Mercola. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Truth becomes treason in an empire of lies. Attacks against health web sites like yours truly and others, and our readers—yes, that would be you—are rapidly escalating.

Thinly veiled threats are issued not just by industry spokespersons (many of whom hide their industry ties from their readers), but also international organizations like UNICEF. It’s become very evident, very quickly, that now more than ever, we need your support to counter the increasingly dirty tactics of these industry players.
Simply by reporting the scientific evidence—which is published in peer-reviewed journals, mind you—I’ve been labeled as a top “anti-vaccine influencer” for my pro-safety stance on vaccines, and a “media supporter of domestic eco-terrorists” for my reporting on the hazards of Roundup and genetically engineered foods.

Why Is UNICEF Accusing Health Journalists of Lying?

A recently published report1 by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) reveals that the organization is tracking "the rise of online pro-vaccine safety sentiments in Central and Eastern Europe,” and has identified the most influential pro-vaccine safety influencers” on the web.
UNICEF included me on the list, along with other independent health websites like GreenMedInfo.com, Mothering.com and NaturalNews.com, just to name a few. In their opening reference, they use a quote by Mark Twain that reads:
“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”
Clearly, UNICEF is inferring that I and other vaccine-safety advocates are lying about the situation and therefore should be ignored. This would be hilarious if it wasn’t so serious.
Here we have an international organization supposedly dedicated to children’s health and well being, and instead of addressing the ample scientific evidence showing the potential harm of vaccines, they’re entering into ever-deepening partnerships with vaccine company giants like Merck2 and GlaxoSmithKline3(GSK).
They spend precious time and resources on public relations schemes to convince you to ignore any science that raises questions about the wisdom of “carpet-bombing” infants’ and young children’s immune systems with potentially harmful vaccines.

UNICEF’s Bedfellows

This is especially disturbing because Merck has been involved in numerous criminal scandals and class-action lawsuits in recent years, including fraudulently marketing its deadly drug Vioxx; lying about the true efficacy of its mumps vaccine.
Additionally, they engaged in scientific fraud (a charge brought by its own scientists); and hiding critical side effects associated with its osteoporosis drugFosamax, just to name a few of the most publicized.
Even more shocking, in 2009, it was revealed that Merck actually had a hit list of doctors to be "neutralized" or discredited for voicing critical opinions about the pain killer Vioxx—a drug that indeed ended up killing more than 60,000 people before it was pulled from the market.
Two years later, in 2011, the company ended up pleading guilty to a criminal charge over the fraudulent marketing and sales of this deadly drug.4 But sure, let’s listen to UNICEF and trust the guys who go so far as to threaten the lives of those who question the safety of a very factually dangerous drug. Then there’s GSK, whose leadership among corporate criminals is illustrious indeed.
Not only was GSK found guilty in the largest health fraud settlement in US history just last year, for which they were fined $3 billion. A couple of months ago, Chinese authorities accused the company of bribery and illegal marketing schemes. Chinese police claim to possess evidence showing that bribery has been a "core part" of GSK China's business model since 2007.
Doctors and government officials are said to have received perks such as travel, cash, and sexual favors that when combined, amounted to nearly $5 billion, according to some reports. The company allegedly used travel agencies as middlemen to carry out these illegal acts. Four Chinese GSK executives have so far been detained on charges of cash and sexual bribery.
GSK also spent more than 10 years covering up information that proved they knew about the serious health dangers of their blockbuster diabetes drug Avandia, as it would adversely affect sales. While carousing with the true liars and criminals, UNICEF deems it fitting to paint me and other health journalists as the liars; the ones leading you astray.
Little does UNICEF realize that by publicizing a list of monitored “vaccine influencers”—the health reporters who stick pegs in the wheels of their crafty PR schemes by publishing all those studies the vaccine industry would rather see buried—they’ve basically given you a Who’s Who of real vaccine information.
Maybe we should thank them rather than rail against their poor judgment? As stated by Sayer Ji5 of Greenmedinfo.com, who was also targeted in the report:
“[W]hile the document purports to be analytical and descriptive, it has proscriptive and defamatory undertones, and only thinly conceals an agenda to discredit opposing views and voices. UNICEF's derogatory stance.
This is all the more surprising considering that websites such as GreenMedinfo.com aggregate, disseminate and provide open access to peer-reviewed research on vaccine adverse effects and safety concerns extracted directly from the US National Library of Medicine, much of which comes from high-impact journals.”

GMO-Labeling Supporters Now Accused of Supporting Eco-Terrorism. What’s Next?

Another recent article, published in Forbes Magazine,6 really ups the ante of the attack on health journalists and their readers with the headline: “ Domestic Eco-Terrorism Has Deep Pockets. And Many Enablers.” The article, written by Jay Byme and Henry I.Miller, reads in part:
“In recent years, [eco]terrorists have attempted to gain sympathy and “justification” for their actions by means of disinformation campaigns that relentlessly smear the safety and utility of genetic engineering applied to agriculture... “Frankenfood” headlines may sell newspapers and organic food, but this kind of “black marketing” — enhancing the perceived value of your products by disparaging those of your competitors – can also encourage serious criminal acts.
...There exists in this country a vast, well-established, highly professional, protest industry fueled by special interest groups seeking to line their own pockets... Anti-genetic engineering campaigns are openly funded and promoted by mainstream organic food marketers like Gary Hirshberg, the chairman of Stonyfield Organic, and alternative health and food-supplement hucksters Joe Mercola and Mike Adams — all cynical fear-profiteers who benefit from increased consumer mistrust in their competitors’ products... The ultimate objective, of course, is to sell more overpriced, overrated organic food...
One result of the widely disseminated disinformation effort is an environment that provides encouragement to extremists who commit criminal acts. It comes from the Facebook and Twitter followers of the genetic engineering conspiracy theorists, organic marketers and “right to know” labeling activists... Against the backdrop of this fear-mongering, hate-speech and support for acts of terror toward legal, highly regulated, safe and societally valuable R&D, we should condemn not only the perpetrators themselves but also their corporate and media enablers.”

Why Am I on Biotech’s Hit List?

Alright, now that we’ve been  labeled as “enablers of domestic eco-terrorism” as well—again by simply reporting on research that is published in peer-reviewed journals and interviewing educated researchers and professionals in the field—let’s take a look at who’s behind the  name calling.  The first author of this hit-piece is Jay Byrne, whose author’s bio identifies him as president of v-Fluence Interactive Public Relations, Inc.  Why does Mr. Byrne fail to mention in his bio that he was a former Monsanto executive?
Jay Byrne actually headed up corporate communications for Monsanto Company from 1997 to 2001. And this piece is nothing if not a corporate communication; clearly, there are persistent ties there. How nice for Monsanto to be able to call up their old communications director and have him pen a totally impartial article warning you of your eco-terrorism ties and contributions, should you decide to support a GMO labeling campaign. Back in 2001, Jay Byrne also made the following statement, which is more than a little telling:
“Imagine the internet as a weapon, sitting on a table. Either you use it or your opponent does, but somebody’s going to get killed.”
Byrne’s company v-Fluence Interactive Public Relations7 is also a thinly veiled arm of big Biotech. According to Byrne,“traditionally produced foods and agricultural practices are under attack... Leveraging such issues as pesticides, GMOs, hormones, antibiotics, Mad Cow disease, CAFOs and trade concerns linked to risk factors (human health, environmental risks and consumer choices/controls).” If that’s not a statement taken right out of Big Biotech’s playbook, I don’t know what is. He’s certainly not speaking with any concern for your health and wellbeing.
Perhaps Jay would like to address the recent contamination of alfalfa and wheat exports. While it was just recently approved for commercial use, it was already found in contaminated and rejected exports sending yet another shock to countries who require labeling or reject genetically engineered crops. Monsanto is single-handedly destroying farmer's export markets by genetically polluting and contaminating our entire agriculture.
The following slide is from his 2013 conference presentation8 on Food and Agricultural Advocacy, which carries the following description (you can view the slideshow in its entirety here):
“These five stakeholders represent a core group of commercial players who act in advocacy roles seeking to influence public attitudes, commercial and governmental policies negatively impacting agriculture and food biotechnology. These influencers directly or via their organizations have been principal drivers via direct activities, funding or complementary marketing behind North American antiGMO advocacy campaigns in 2011.
While the scope of this report focused on NGOs it is important to note that absent commercial partners – specifically those in the organic, natural products and alternative health sectors – who provide funding and other leverage for antiGMO advocacy there would be little effective or sustained advocacy in this space.”


Remember Henry Miller?

Coincidentally, if the name Henry I. Miller—the second author of that hit piece—rings a bell, it could be because you paid attention during last year’s campaign to get genetically engineered foods labeled in California. He was front and center of the “No on Prop 37” campaign, posing as a Stanford professor in TV commercials and flyers, telling California voters that the ballot measure was “arbitrary,” “completely illogical,” and “ill conceived.”
In reality, he’s not a Stanford professor; he’s a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, a conservative think tank that happens to be housed on the Stanford campus. Furthermore, Stanford has a policy to not take positions on candidates or ballot measures, and does not allow political filming on campus. The campaign’s TV ad was eventually pulled due to the misrepresentation of Miller.9 He also has a long history10 of defending toxic chemicals such as DDT, in addition to working for Big Tobacco.
If you care about your right to know what’s in your food, your right to choose organic, and your right to learn how your food is being produced, I suggest you etch the names Jay Byrne and Henry Miller into your memory, so you know exactly who is speaking when you come across their industry PR pieces, because nowhere do either of these men fess up their close ties to the industries they defend.

The Science Media Centre—the Dark Side’s PR Center

Another not-so-independent source of information is anything generated by the Science Media Centre (SMC).11 Headquartered in the UK, there is also a US-based outlet.12 The SMC13 claims to be “an independent press office helping to ensure that the public have access to the best scientific evidence and expertise through the news media when science hits the headlines.” Yet their list of funding sources reads like a a Who’s Who of big biotech14 -- multibillion dollar giants like:
BASFBayerCropLife (pesticide and biotech trade group)Abbott Laboratories
MonsantoNovartisSyngentaAstra Zeneca
Coca-ColaBiochemical SocietyChemical Industries AssociationGlaxoSmithKline

The organization lays claim to being objective and non-biased because they don’t receive more than five percent or so of their funding from any one company, organization or individual. But how non-biased can you possibly be when so much of the funding comes from different companies and front groups within the same industries? Their highly conflicted panel of “experts” represent the funding industries and are NOT providing the media with objective academic feedback. Why would any company pay to have some independent, objective expert speak out against them? In short, the SMC has one agenda, and that is to deceive you with corporate propaganda.
For example, they provide handy tips to their “independent” experts in a document15 called “Communicating Risks in a Soundbite: A Guide for Scientists.” It explains how to respond to media questions by downplaying problems. For example, if a reporter asks, “Is it risky?” the scientist should get the journalist to instead ask about the benefits by replying, “the benefits outweigh the risks.” Another suggested answer: “It is a very small risk. So small that I believe it is safe.”
Not exactly players with an objective view of science.
This might explain why the Science Media Centre pounced16 on the French study showing organ damage and massive cancer tumors in rats fed GE corn. This was the first lifetime feeding study that has ever been conducted with GE food, so it was sure to be a major embarrassment to Big Biotech. The very same day the French report was published came a press release17 from the Science Media Centre claiming “anomalies throughout the paper” despite the authors having been through the usual peer review process.
In short, you can bet if there’s a harmful substance out there that makes money, there are at least one or more front groups, posing as independent non-profit organizations, disseminating anything but independent safety reviews and information pertaining to it. It’s high time to pull back the curtain and see who’s really pulling the strings and levers.
I hope you will support not only this web site by reading and sharing what you learn here with others, but also any number of other health journalists reporting the results of research that Big Business would rather you didn’t know. It’s quite clear that many of us have targets on our proverbial backs, and the attacks are quickly escalating. Now is the time to stand together, form a united front, and show them that we simply will not be cowed by their thinly-veiled threats.

Why Does Monsanto Hate Americans?

Interestingly ,Monsanto seems to be fine with supporting GMO labeling when there’s no other choice. Here’s a Monsanto ad from the UK, letting British consumers know how much the company supports the mandatory labeling of their goods—even urging Britons to seek such labels out—ostensibly because Monsanto believes “you should be aware of all the facts before making a decision.” What’s the difference between British shoppers and American shoppers? Why does Monsanto support one nation’s right to know but not another?



Here is a picture of starving children.  Note the bellies are fat, yet the rest of their bodies are skin and bone.

Now look at any American these days.  Bellies are fat while the rest of the body is out of proportion.  Our food supply is horrible despite the amount we have.  More people go to bed starving in the US than probably any other country per capita,  yet your belly is full.  You are starving for nutrition.  What the American diet lacks.  Because of this, you end up sick and have all kinds of medical complications.  The doctors won't pinpoint the real underlying issues, they will just treat the symptoms.  It's a rigged system and it's rigged against you.  But it's all your fault anyway is what they tell you.  

  One book we read, the best hospital administrators can tell what kind of doctors to staff and how to maximize the hospital for maximum income based on a simple trip to the local grocery stores and looking at the fast food restaurants in any given area.  Heart specialists, cancer specialists, diabetes specialists......
Drug stores know exactly what to stock based on food trends for those fast so called remedies.  

   Another scary story.  Doctors went on strike in one US city for two weeks effectively shutting down the healthcare in the area.  The death toll actually went down substantially during that two week period.  (WOW).   

  From yet another book, a professor at a college wanted to show his students the superiority of food based vitamin C as opposed to synthetic vitamin C.  He went to the local supermarket and bought a bunch of oranges for his classes.  At the end of the day he was horrified.  The oranges had no vitamin C content.  He went to the supermarket to find out what was going on.  It turns out that the oranges in question came in from South Africa and were picked green 3 years before making it into the store.  They were warehoused for over 2 years before being shipped.  When they made it to the US, they were recolored orange with food dyes and sold as fresh.

  Keep in mind that the health care industry is just that, an industry and as an industry it's main function is to make money and do so any way it can.  It's not about ethics, it's about dollars.  Besides, if you are not properly nourished, you are not thinking to your maximum potential and you do not have the energy to fight what is going on.  How can they lose that battle?

  Is it fact or science fiction?  You have to wonder.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Terry McAuliffe Lying To Everyone?




Well throughout most of the video, you can tell that Mr Cuccinelli is reading a teleprompter.  It is also disturbing that if he donated 18 thousand dollars to a local charity because of the issues surrounding him over the Star Scientific Gifts, then he is probably guilty of that claim.  Not good.  On the other hand, the fact that he is trying to make up for a misdeed, shows character at least.

Here is a question though.  If you take something out of Wal Mart and do not pay for it and get caught, can you go back into Wal Mart and pay for it afterward and not go to jail or have any charges put against you?  Why should politicians get a pass?  Disturbing.

Now let's go to Terry McAuliffe.  

Here is one of Terry's recent emails to people.

"I wrote you earlier this week that national Republicans and Tea Party groups are flooding Ken Cuccinelli's campaign with donations. (The Republican Governors Association has given nearly $6 million!)

But here's what I didn't know on Monday:

My opponent and his right-wing allies are putting that money right to work. Last week, the Republicans spent nearly 50% more than we did on television ads.

If they continue to outspend us on TV, they'll drown out our message, and we could fall seriously behind.

We're just $22,564 short of funding our Rapid Response Fund by ourmidnight deadline tonight. Please donate $5 right now to make sure we hit our goal before we submit our next fundraising report.

I know you're seeing a lot of TV ads these days. My family's getting pretty tired of them, too.

But TV ads are one of the most critical tools we have to reach undecided voters as they're starting to make up their minds about who they'd like to entrust with the leadership of our Commonwealth.

And recently, each one of our ads — explaining my vision for Virginia's future or drawing a contrast with my opponent's record — was being outmatched by ads paid for by extreme Republican donors like the Koch Brothers.

At midnight tonight, my campaign faces a critical deadline, after which we have to file a public fundraising report.

And tomorrow, I'm meeting with my campaign staff to make final decisions about where we spend our funds in the final weeks.

I need your $5 donation to help us fully fund our Rapid Response Fund before midnight. We can close the potentially devastating imbalance of TV ads with your help.

I'm counting on you,

- Terry

Now Here Is The Real Story:

According to the news yesterday, Tuesday, September 17th, 2013, Terry McAuliffe has over 5 million dollars in his campaign fund. Cuccinelli?  About 2.5 million.  That means that Terry has more than twice what Ken has and here is Terry crying for money and complaining that Ken is getting huge sums of cash.  

I have issues watching Ken Cuccinelli's campaign.  I will not put up with Terry McAuliffe and these outrageous and false claims.  Do we need a governor who will lie to us?  If he is blatantly lying to the people now, what will he do as governor?  No thanks Terry.  Go somewhere else. 

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.
Have a news story? Submit it above.
Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.
Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.
We cover what no one else will.
Like us on Facebook, Tweet us, Plus One us,
Follow us through email,
follow us on Twitter.
Become a member of this site.

Stay up to date on all the latest.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Cornmeal Sauages From Scratch - Recipe of the day



Place in a saucepan
One and one-half cups of boiling water,
One cup of finely chopped onion,
One cup of finely chopped left-over meat,
One teaspoon of salt,
One teaspoon of white pepper,
One-half teaspoon of poultry seasoning,
Two-thirds cup of cornmeal.
Stir well to prevent lumping and cook slowly for one-half hour. Turn into a bowl and let cool. Form into sausages, then roll in flour and brown in hot fat. Serve with brown gravy, cream or tomato sauce.

From an old recipe book.

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.
Have a news story? Submit it above.
Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.
Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.
We cover what no one else will.
Like us on Facebook, Tweet us, Plus One us,
Follow us through email,
follow us on Twitter.
Become a member of this site.
Stay up to date on all the latest.


Enhanced by Zemanta