Showing posts with label Tobacco. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tobacco. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Don't Forget 1663 Gloucester, Virginia Slave Revolt

Benjamin Todd Jealous



Like March on Washington, Gloucester County Conspiracy carries lessons for today.

Three hundred years before a multiracial coalition stormed Washington's National Mall to demand equal rights and economic justice, the working men of Gloucester County, Va., made a stand of their own based on class, not race. We often ask whether Martin Luther King Jr. would recognize the world in 2013, but it is equally valid to ask whether he would have recognized the world of 1663, when black and white children of slaves and servants did play together in the tobacco fields.

One of the forgotten landmarks of civil rights history occurred 350 years ago Sunday: Sept. 1, 1663. This day marks the first recorded instance of African slaves and European indentured servants standing together for justice against the ruling elite.

The Gloucester County Conspiracy took place at a time when Virginia tobacco growers relied on both slaves and indentured servants to farm tobacco. Management treated their workers with cruel abandon, regardless of color.

Unwilling to accept their fate, a group of black and white workers met in secret to plan a revolt. After securing weapons and a drum, they would "march from house to house" until they reached the mansion of Royal Governor Sir William Berkeley. They would demand their freedom, and resort to force if necessary.

Though the plot failed, the landowners recognized the power that the Gloucester rebels possessed when banded together. Over the next several decades, they sought to breed racial contempt between the white and black members of the underclass. On the plantation level, they gave whites nominal control in the field. On the colony level, they allowed whites to join the militia and carry firearms. As historian Edmund Morgan writes, the landowners used racism as a device for control.

On this 350th anniversary, the Gloucester rebellion can teach us as much about our character as the March on Washington.

The rebels in Gloucester recognized what King memorialized in his famous remarks: we are, by our nature, capable of great things when we judge one another solely on the content of our character, not by the color of our skin.

The original state of race relations in America is one of shared struggle, not mutually assured destruction. It is ultimately the introduction of an outside variable -- money, power, or the desire for control -- that tends to alter that natural state.

It turns out that 2013 is a perfect year for this lesson. The fight for voting rights is making its own 50th anniversary curtain call, in the form of the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder and countless voter suppression laws that affect African-Americans but also Americans of all colors, ages and incomes. The failed War on Drugs continues to destroy families in black inner city America, and, increasingly, white rural America.

Finally, 45 years after King was killed in the midst of his Poor People's Campaign, low-wage workers of all hues are organizing across geographic and demographic lines to demand a higher minimum wage.

Politics is a lot like physics. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, and objects in motion eventually return to their original state. As we tackle these challenges, let us consider that the original state of race relations in America may be one of unity -- and that the possibility of moving beyond our nation's legacy of racism is obtainable.

In his 1869 speech "Our Composite Nationality," Frederick Douglass wrote about the unique phenomenon and mission of America. On this anniversary, let us remember his words:

"Our geographical position, our relation to the outside world, our fundamental principles of Government ... our vast resources, requiring all manner of labor to develop them, and our already existing composite population, all conspire to one grand end, and that is to make us the most perfect national illustration of the unity and dignity of the human family, that the world has ever seen."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/09/01/benjamin-todd-jealous-on-gloucester-rebellion/2730559/  USA Today link back to original story.

Not exactly sure what this guy is talking about, but we are researching the information.  Here is some interesting notes to look at in the mean time.  

COPY:  http://www.virginiamemory.com/online_classroom/shaping_the_constitution/doc/gowenpetition

The practice of indentured servitude in England grew out of older feudal systems and apprenticeship practices that had their roots in the Middle Ages. The Virginia Company of London contracted with the first Virginia settlers for their labor, and, when the Company started trading land for service and tobacco became the first profitable cash crop, Virginia's style of indentured servitude coalesced. By the 1620s, a standard system had been put into place whereby servants negotiated the terms of their indentures with a merchant, ship's captain, or other agent before sailing to Virginia. Their indentures were then sold to planters when the servants arrived in the colony.

The beginning of lifelong servitude or slavery in Virginia is very hard to trace. There is evidence that Africans may have already been in the colony before the first documented appearance of them in John Rolfe's 1619 letter, which mentions, "20. and odd Negroes" arriving in Jamestown. Whether or not a person of African descent was held in slavery was a matter of circumstances unclear to modern historians. The person's status as a Christian or a non-Christian, and whether or not the person had previously been enslaved definitely affected how he or she was treated in the colony. The most important thing to note is that some African Virginians were not held as slaves at the beginning of the colony's history. Although many of the laws restricting African Virginians were passed in the 1660s, slavery did not become codified in Virginia law until 1705.

Phillip Gowen was the son of Mihill Gowen, a free African Virginian, who had once worked for Amye Beazlye, the woman who had freed Phillip in her will. This petition to Governor William Berkeley and the Council of State was probably written for Gowen by a person familiar with the petitioning process; the document makes use of standard structure and language of petitions from that era. Gowen sought relief from his new master, whom he declared was attempting to prolong his servitude. After reviewing the petition, the governor and council ordered that Gowen be freed. This document gives an example of the precarious situation of African Americans in the early colony before slavery was completely institutionalized.

End Copy:

We will keep digging.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 24, 2013

Gloucester wins grant for cigarette problem at Beaverdam

Matt Sabo
Gloucester County has received a $500 grant to help solve its problem with smokers tossing cigarette butts around Beaverdam Park.
The grant is from the organization "Keep Virginia Beautiful" that funds attempts at litter prevention, according to a press release. Beaverdam Park has a 635-acre pond and more than 10 miles of trails, but visitors frequently discard their cigarette butts around the park.
The cigarettes pose a huge fire danger in addition to emitting toxic chemicals that leach into wildlife habitats, according to a spokesperson for Keep Virginia Beautiful. County staff will purchase cigarette receptacles and post signs to encourage Beaverdam Park visitors to properly dispose of their cigarettes.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Smokers Now Responsible For World Destruction

its hard keeping this one on one hand and the ...
its hard keeping this one on one hand and the camera on the other. :) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
First it was complaints about smokers and then complaints about secondhand smoke.  Many of the complaints are more than fair.  But now the new mantra coming out is third hand smoke?  Really?  No joke.  The newest complaints are now the effects of third hand smoke.  MPNNCSB is now running ads as well as planting what seems like fake letters to the editor of newspapers complaining of third hand smoke.

This is a very blatant targeting of people and would we dare say, profiling of a certain class of people?

One letter to the editor of a local paper stated that this one person goes around picking up the cigarette butts of smokers off the ground because the butts are so toxic to our environment.  One cigarette butt can contaminate 2.5 gallons of water.  The article also pointed out that it takes 13 years for a cigarette butt to disintegrate.  13 years?  And how many millions of taxpayer dollars went into that study?  Also, was that a plastic filter that was used to determine that?  Most manufacturers do not use plastic filters anymore but a small amount of brands still do.  The letter did not state what type of filter was studied or who did the study, so it was not a real complaint in our book.  Just a false statement at best.

  What we want to know is who is going around putting drip pans underneath all the parked vehicles in all the parking lots across the world to collect the oil, transmission fluid, brake fluid, anti-freeze and other contaminants that are leaking out of automobiles on a regular basis causing by far more caustic issues than someone's cigarette butt.  Where is the screaming mantra about a vehicle free workplace?  Why isn't anyone demanding that every owner of property install drip pans in the parking lots to collect all of these contaminants from vehicles?  Imagine the industry that can be created by collecting and recycling all of these fluids?

  Also, what about all of the exhaust coming out of every running vehicle?  Should we now argue that mechanics need to work outdoors because of all the toxic air inside the garage where they work?  What about when they go home and all the third hand smells from all the grease, oil and other vehicle fluid contaminants that mechanics are loaded with?  Should they be forced to stay out of stores until they are decontaminated?

  The ads of MPNNCSB target people and do nothing to address the underlying issues of those addicted to tobacco.  No solutions are offered.  Only complaints. So let's look at other very serious issues that this group needs to be addressing.  Such as indoor air quality.




And exactly how is MPNNCSB addressing these issues?  Well they are not.  Instead they are attacking a group of people.  What we want to know is when are they going to come up with fourth hand smoke and fifth hand smoke issues.  Further complaints we saw in one of the letters to the editor is recycling cigarette butts and how you can't because they are so highly contaminated.  It's like recycling grease.  No one wants it.

  We understand the dangers of smoking and understand that most people do not want to be around tobacco smoke.  That is not the issue.  To continue to complain about smokers instead of addressing the underlying issues is a farce at best.  Create all the smoke free workplaces you want and let smokers refuse to spend even a dime with you.  Until these people address all the other issues, they should really stop these complaints.  If you agree, you can call them at 1-888-PREV-550 or 1-804-642-5402 or email them at prevent@mpnn.state.va.us

  Smokers need to demand that their tax dollars not be wasted on such foolishness.



Enhanced by Zemanta