Monday, January 20, 2014

Anti Federalist Papers No. 37 – Factions And The Constitution

. . . . To have a just idea of the government before us, and to show that a consolidated one is the object in view, it is necessary not only to examine the plan, but also its history, and the politics of its particular friends.
The confederation was formed when great confidence was placed in the voluntary exertions of individuals, and of the respective states; and the framers of it, to guard against usurpation, so limited, and checked the powers, that, in many respects, they are inadequate to the exigencies of the union. We find, therefore, members of congress urging alterations in the federal system almost as soon as it was adopted. It was early proposed to vest congress with powers to levy an impost, to regulate trade, etc. , but such was known to be the caution of the states in parting with power, that the vestment even of these, was proposed to be under several checks and limitations.

During the war, the general confusion, and the introduction of paper money, infused in the minds of the people vague ideas respecting government and credit. We expected too much from the return of peace, and of course we have been disappointed. Our governments have been new and unsettled; and several legislatures, by making tender, suspension, and paper money laws, have given just cause of uneasiness to creditors. By these and other causes, several orders of men in the community have been prepared, by degrees, for a change of government. And this very abuse of power in the legislatures, which in some cases has been charged upon the democratic part of the community, has furnished aristocratical men with those very weapons, and those very means, with which, in great measure, they are rapidly effecting their favorite object. And should an oppressive government be the consequence of the proposed change, posterity may reproach not only a few overbearing, unprincipled men, but those parties in the states which have misused their powers.

The conduct of several legislatures, touching paper money, and tender laws, has prepared many honest men for changes in government, which otherwise they would not have thought of - when by the evils, on the one hand, and by the secret instigations of artful men, on the other, the minds of men were become sufficiently uneasy, a bold step was taken, which is usually followed by a revolution, or a civil war. A general convention for mere commercial purposes was moved for - the authors of this measure saw that the people's attention was turned solely to the amendment of the federal system; and that, had the idea of a total change been started, probably no state would have appointed members to the convention. The idea of destroying ultimately, the state government, and forming one consolidated system, could not have been admitted - a convention, therefore, merely for vesting in congress power to regulate trade was proposed.
This was pleasing to the commercial towns; and the landed people had little or no concern about it. In September, 1786, a few men from the middle states met at Annapolis, and hastily proposed a convention to be held in May, 1787, for the purpose, generally, of amending the confederation. This was done before the delegates of Massachusetts, and of the other states arrived - still not a word was said about destroying the old constitution, and making a new one. The states still unsuspecting, and not aware that they were passing the Rubicon, appointed members to the new convention, for the sole and express purpose of revising and amending the confederation - and, probably, not one man in ten thousand in the United States, till within these ten or twelve days, had an idea that the old ship was to be destroyed, and be put to the alternative of embarking in the new ship presented, or of being left in danger of sinking. The States, I believe, universally supposed the convention would report alterations in the confederation, which would pass an examination in congress, and after being agreed to there, would be confirmed by all the legislatures, or be rejected.

Virginia made a very respectable appointment, and placed at the head of it the first man in America. In this appointment there was a mixture of political characters; but Pennsylvania appointed principally those men who are esteemed aristocratical. Here the favorite moment for changing the government was evidently discerned by a few men, who seized it with address. Ten other states appointed, and tho' they chose men principally connected with commerce and the judicial department yet they appointed many good republican characters. Had they all attended we should now see, I am persuaded, a better system presented.
The nonattendance of eight or nine men, who were appointed members of the convention, I shall ever consider as a very unfortunate event to the United States. Had they attended, I am pretty clear that the result of the convention would not have had that strong tendency to aristocracy now discernible in every part of the plan. There would not have been so great an accumulation of powers, especially as to the internal police of this country in a few hands as the constitution reported proposes to vest in them - the young visionary men, and the consolidating aristocracy, would have been more restrained than they have been. Eleven states met in the convention, and after four months close attention presented the new constitution, to be adopted or rejected by the people. The uneasy and fickle part of the community may be prepared to receive any form of government; but I presume the enlightened and substantial part will give any constitution presented for their adoption a candid and thorough examination. . . .

We shall view the convention with proper respect - and, at the same time, that we reflect there were men of abilities and integrity in it, we must recollect how disproportionately the democratic and aristocratic parts of the community were represented. Perhaps the judicious friends and opposers of the new constitution will agree, that it is best to let it rely solely on its own merits, or be condemned for its own defects. . . .

This subject of consolidating the states is new. And because forty or fifty men have agreed in a system, to suppose the good sense of this country, an enlightened nation, must adopt it without examination, and though in a state of profound peace, without endeavoring to amend those parts they perceive are defective, dangerous to freedom, and destructive of the valuable principles of republican government - is truly humiliating. It is true there may be danger in delay; but there is danger in adopting the system in its present form.

And I see the danger in either case will arise principally from the conduct and views of two very unprincipled parties in the United States - two fires, between which the honest and substantial people have long found themselves situated. One party is composed of little insurgents, men in debt, who want no law, and who want a share of the property of others; these are called revellers, Shayites, etc. The other party is composed of a few, but more dangerous men, with their servile dependents; these avariciously grasp at all power and property; you may discover in all the actions of these men, an evident dislike to free and equal government, and they will go systematically to work to change, essentially, the forms of government in this country; these are called aristocrats, monarchists, etc. Between these two parties is the weight of the community; the men of middling property, men not in debt on the one hand, and men, on the other, content with republican governments, and not aiming at immense fortunes, offices, and power. In 1786, the little insurgents, the revellers, came forth, invaded the rights of others, and attempted to establish governments according to their wills. Their movements evidently gave encouragement to the other party, which, in 1787, has taken the political field, and with its fashionable dependents, and the tongue and the pen, is endeavoring to establish in a great haste, a politer kind of government. These two parties, which will probably be opposed or united as it may suit their interests and views, are really insignificant, compared with the solid, free, and independent part of the community. It is not my intention to suggest, that either of these parties, and the real friends of the proposed constitution, are the same men.

The fact is, these aristocrats support and hasten the adoption of the proposed constitution, merely because they think it is a stepping stone to their favorite object. I think I am well founded in this idea. I think the general politics of these men support it, as well as the common observation among them: That the proffered plan is the best that can be got at present, it will do for a few years, and lead to something better. The sensible and judicious part of the community will carefully weigh all these circumstances; they will view the late convention as a respectable body of men - America probably never will see an assembly of men, of a like number, more respectable. But the members of the convention met without knowing the sentiments of one man in ten thousand in these states respecting the new ground taken. Their doings are but the first attempts in the most important scene ever opened. Though each individual in the state conventions will not, probably, be so respectable as each individual in the federal convention, yet as the state conventions will probably consist of fifteen hundred or two thousand men of abilities, and versed in the science of government, collected from all parts of the community and from all orders of men, it must be acknowledged that the weight of respectability will be in them. In them will be collected the solid sense and the real political character of the country. Being revisers of the subject, they will possess peculiar advantages. To say that these conventions ought not to attempt, coolly and deliberately, the revision of the system, or that they cannot amend it, is very foolish or very assuming. . . .


THE FEDERAL FARMER

Learn More About US History by visiting Jamestown, Yorktown and Colonial Williamsburg living museums in Virginia and keeping this site bookmarked as er bring you history no one else can.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Senator Ron Johnson Suing Obama

Official photographic portrait of US President...
Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The Washington political class is well aware of what we all know to be certain: that ObamaCare is an unmitigated disaster.
The Democrat Members of Congress and staffers who wrote the 1,600 page monstrosity knew it would increase premiums and restrict individual choice. But the last thing President Obama wanted was to have the very Democrat congressmen and senators who passed ObamaCare to revolt on his signature legislation.
So what did he do? Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to create a special exemption so Democrat Members of Congress and their staff could continue to receive federal contributions to their health plans.
That's right: President Obama issued an order to direct taxpayer funds to shield Democrat Members of Congress from the harmful effects of the very law they passed.
This is not only wrong -- but I also believe it's illegal. And, worse, it's indicative of the continued abuse of power and flagrant disregard of the Constitution by this President.
That's why I've decided to file a lawsuit against the Obama Administration.
It's crucial we stop Obama's rule by Presidential decree. It's critical that the law is applied equally to the political class.
If they don't like the law, then the Washington elite should be forced to pass another law to change it - or, preferably, repeal the whole thing.
Help me put pressure on Washington liberals and the Obama Administration to stop this special treatment for politicians.

Here is the bottom line that no one is even talking about.  Obamacare was designed to fail from the outset.  It does not include alternative medicine to compete against mainstream medicine which would give citizens the right to choose the form of health care you would prefer.  You are not offered any choices.  You get what you are given and anything else is off limits unless you want to pay for it yourself which may just become illegal for you to do.  That is a major crime in our view.   It destroys competition and alternative choices.  It cuts out what may just save lives.  Where are the liberals on this?  Not a peep.  Where are the conservatives on this?  Also no peeps.  Instead the politicians are just destroying your ability to have real choices in health care and making sure you pay a fortune for this tremendous lack of choices and lack of respect.  Fire them all.  And this guy is complaining about taxpayer funding for democrats?  Please, that's only a small issue when you look at the overall bigger picture.
Enhanced by Zemanta

CNN News - Jennifer Lawrence: My dress is squeezing my breasts

Jennifer Lawrence on the red carpet at the 83r...
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)



Jennifer Lawrence reveals that her SAG dress is "squeezing her breasts into her armpits.

This is what CNN is passing off as news.  The sad part here is that some people think this is news.  First off, who cares?  Second off, who cares and third, why should we care?  Main Stream Media news.  Yeah, it's all that.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Gerald Celente - Jeff Rense Show - January 9, 2014 - Video News



Embedding is disabled for this video but we found a backdoor to get it up on here.

We happen to like Gerald Celente so we bring you whatever we can to keep everyone up to date on economic affairs.  The first 3 minutes is mostly music but it becomes apparent fast that they have a meaning for it.

  Not sure if we fully agree with them on the arguments that cover grace and style.  They fail to cover areas like classical music, symphonies that are all around the nation and play a lot of free public concerts that fill entire areas during those free concerts.  Reenactments that do convey old fashioned style and flair.

  Now of course the days we live in are different than they were in the past, but what they fail to look at is that what they are talking about was viewed as out of control by their elders.  Rock music is lacking in many areas, it is also very forward in other areas.  Classical Operetta Rock is pretty amazing stuff that these guys fail to look at.

  Later these guys get into the new police state we are in and the NSA has made that statement official for the United States.  It's towards the end that the economic news for the world is discussed.  Nuclear Fallout Warnings you do not hear about anywhere else is reported here because of Japan's nuclear power plant meltdown, but Homer finds a doughnut.    
Enhanced by Zemanta

Making 2014 a Year of Action to Expand Opportunities for the Middle Class

Official photographic portrait of US President...
Official photographic portrait of US President Barack Obama (born 4 August 1961; assumed office 20 January 2009) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)



In this week’s address, President Obama says 2014 will be a year of action, and called on both parties to help make this a breakthrough year for the United States by bringing back more good jobs and expanding opportunities for the middle class.

Wait a second.  Listen to that again.  The President says that if congress will not act on these initiatives, he will act on them himself without them?  Exactly how is that constitutional?  Did he all of a sudden become supreme dictator?  You have to ask the question.  Also, he states it very clearly that we are not at all dependent on foreign oil, so exactly why are gas prices so high?  What he does not tell you is we are the world's largest exporter of oil and have been for years.  So why are our oil prices pegged to foreign oil when we do not even use foreign oil?  Anyone finding anything wrong with these statements?

  You can download and share this podcast with anyone you wish.  
Enhanced by Zemanta

Citibank: Make the Citi Health credit card terms fair

English: First 4 digits of a credit card
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The Citi Health Card -- a medical credit card from Citibank -- is one of the sneakiest credit products on the market today. The product includes "deferred interest" and a 30% interest rate. What this means is that after an introductory rate of 18 months, even after paying the minimum payment (or more) for the entire 18-mo period, the debtor incurs a finance charge for the 30% against the original balance.

I had an original debt of $4,000 that I had paid down to $2,881 over the 18 month introductory term of the Citi Health credit card. On the 19th month, after making payments every month, I was saddled with an additional $1954 debt due to the sneaky "deferred interest" clause.

Consumers are often signing up for this card when they have no other way to pay for out-of-pocket medical and dental costs. Worse still is that these products are exempt from federal truth-in-lending requirements, meaning that the medical professional doesn't even have to understand or explain the terms of the credit card to the consumer.

People trust their doctors and dentists and when they're told they need to buy a service (for example, corrective braces to prevent teeth from striking together which would ultimately cause teeth to fall out). When their medical professional tells them there's a debt product that can help them afford the procedure/product, they trust that their doctor wouldn't lead them into a trap.

A 30% interest rate is absurd for someone who pays their minimum payment on time and the whole idea of retroactive, deferred interest is sneaky at best. Citbank needs to stop tricking customers; they should:

- reduce the interest rate to a standard calculation (Prime + a rate based on user's credit score or debt-to-income ratio);

- adhere to the Truth in Lending Act (including use of Schumer box to make clear the interest rates being charged); and

- remove deferred interest features (interest can only be charged on the balance at end of promotional period, not original balance, and can only be charged on a go-forward basis, not retroactively)

Let's send a message to Citibank that consumers have enough to worry about without being tricked into these poisonous debt products.

By Ian Miller

Sent to us through Change.org's website.  

Enhanced by Zemanta

This Tiny Sliver Has HUGE Implications For How The World Works

Bikini
 (Photo credit: memoflores)



Our last post was the so called conservative spin on the news and here is the liberal spin on recent news.  Frankly we do not buy the studies on climate change and the information being reported here.  The Young Turks are a liberal news media outlet that is off the main stream.  Again, we do not always disagree with what they talk about, but we also do not buy into a lot of their disinformation.

  We polled 9,000 scientists where 99.9 percent said they did not believe that climate change is man made.  So where is the evidence of the Young Turks to show that their statistics are correct?  For that matter, where are ours?  We don't have any.  Why not?  We didn't conduct a poll.  We are just telling you we did.  So are they.  They are just telling you that someone conducted some poll.  Where is the evidence of the poll?  It's spin.  Anarchistic spin with no real meat.

  So where is the news story then?  It's man made so no reason to worry about it.  It's as clear as the evidence that climate change is caused by man.  Junk science and junk news.  Ya gotta love these people.   Oh yeah, 75 percent of Americans do not believe in man made climate change.  Where do they get that 60 percent do?  Again we made up our numbers to show that they are not providing any verifiable facts on their numbers.
Enhanced by Zemanta