Ex 911 Operator Holli M Cohoon Responds

Sunday at 9-1-1 (Photo credit: MoHotta18)

Image via CrunchBase

We recently have had several emails from Holli M Cohoon, the one who was the 911 operator in the case we have been covering for several months now.  We are going to show you what her response to all of this has been.  Before we show you her response, we are reprinting the information in question.
In order to follow the entire story, you can CLICK HERE and go to our site where the only thing on the site is evidence of this case.  We are now starting off with the soundtrack from the 911 call.

911 operator call testimony from Chuck Thompson

Now keep in mind, we took the 911 call recording and had it analyzed by a 911 call center professional who informed us every area where the call recording was in violation of 911 call protocols.  We were informed that there are only two ways to interpret this recording.  One, it's fake.  Two, it;s a cut up piece of evidence or in other words, highly tampered with.  Now this is just the 911 recording itself.  We have not even begun to touch on the other two pieces below this recording.

  Now let's look at Holli's own testimony that comes directly from the court transcripts.   To open with, Holli states that the 911 recording that you just heard above is a true and correct copy of the 911 call she received.  Holli then claims that she can not remember if she called the victim in this case back or if the victim called her back.  This was only a few months after the incident.  Question right here.  Where is the recording of this second call?  According to the Gloucester County Sheriff's Office, all calls from that time period have since been erased and that there is no evidence that even this call took place.  They have no record of it.  I have the email from them on this.  So without evidence of there being a second call, no second call ever took place.

  Now I also have to ask the question, where did Holli come up with the victim being armed with a shovel?  All one has to do is listen to the above 911 recording again and at no time is a shovel mentioned.  In fact, a gun is not mentioned either, yet you hear Holli state not one but two times for the victim to not shoot out that door.  Holli's testimony here about the victim having a shovel can only come from having conversations with both sheriff's deputies and animal control officers in collusion to develop their evidence story.  In other words, it sure looks like Holli is lying and perjuring herself to no end.

  The second audio recording we have numerous people stating what they heard Holli say that is in direct conflict with the 911 call recording as well as Holli's own testimony.  At this point there was enough to throw this case out.  In our opinion, Michael T Soberick was either a lousy 10 cent lawyer or he was misrepresenting his client and working more for the county.

  Now let's look at Holli M Cohoon's recent statements to all of this.  Sent via her Facebook account email.

I dont normally use this facebook account and just saw this message. Perhaps you should think outside your circle of friends and attempt to get all statements before publishing info. I have no idea about your "fun raid" theory. I simply answered a 911 call and was told by another dispatcher that an officer was at the door with animal control and to tell the caller the same. When the caller disconnected from the 911 call, I called her back on a landline! I dont know why the second call was not taken to court as I stated in testimony! I didnt and dont have access to the "taped call database"... that would be my prior supervisor! ASK her! Perhaps it was "gone" by the time the tape was requested because it was a landline, I DONT KNOW! The 911 call you have on your site is NOT altered in any way as I recall the conversation, but I did call her back! I DID NOT LIE in court, I DID NOT recieve a "payoff" and I DONT know of any conspieracy.. I dont even know which deputies were on her property other than Sgt. Emauelle. Perhaps thats why I was told to answer that perticular 911 call !! Lets get the "new girl"! I worked at the sheriffs office less than 2 years while preparing to open a business. It was not my "cup of tea" and VERY well known! I was not friends with or in any circle of friends within the sheriffs office.. didnt attend parties, gossip etc. I am a "come here" and left the Glou Shefiffs Office as soon as I got a loan for the business. You are "investigating" the wrong person, I am requesting that you take all info about me and my business off your website and turn your attention torwards those who know what the hell when on that day. Like I said, I was new to this county, an outsider, and have no idea about all the crazy crap that goes on in Gloucester County "good ol'boy" Society. Just wish we hadnt moved to this crazy place! Thanks!

To begin with, just because she claims she does not use that facebook page does not mean she didn't get the message as the message would have went straight to her email account.  Strike one.  Second, she is arguing about getting her side of the story before publishing any story.  Well, this was the chance.  She didn't want to respond before this.  Third, I never asked her about any kind of fun raid. she got that from reading this site.  That's three strikes already.

  Now this is where everything really becomes interesting.  Holli claims she was told to answer the 911 call from the victim and that there was already a deputy and animal control on the property?  Major violations of 911 protocol.  How did the 911 operators know this ahead of time?  This is very serious stuff Holli just released.  

  And now Holli, who after 3 months, based on her own testimony now states that she called the victim back when she stated in a court she could not remember who called who?  This is now more than two years later?  And what is with the land line statement?  Is she telling us that all 911 calls are not land line calls coming in?

  Also, now Holli is saying that there is a second phone call?  The sheriff's department has no record of a second phone call.  Someone here is lying.  Holli is also saying that the 911 call above is not altered.  She states this above.  Well then she blatantly refused to follow protocol for 911 emergency procedures then?  That's what she is saying otherwise.  She states she did not lie in court.  Where did the shovel come from Holli?  There is no evidence of any conversation of a shovel.  You didn't lie?  Really?  I'm having a very hard time believing that.

   One also has to love her statement, "I did not receive a payoff."  No one ever said she did.  Isn't it interesting that she brings this up?  Now another interesting area here at this point is Holli making the claim," let's get the new girl.",  What does that mean?  Is she saying she was setup?  Why would she even think that somehow she might have been setup?  

  Another interesting area is Holli's statement that she was only working the 911 call center until a loan came through for her to open up her present business, Sunrise Donuts. Try and get a 911 call center job sometime.  One goes through a lot to qualify for that job.  The background checks and intense interviews are not easy to pass.  It's not like getting a job at Wal Mart.  It's a career job.  A tough job no question about it, but it's not something one goes into while waiting for a loan.  

  Holli makes it very clear here that everyone at the Sheriff's office knew she hated her job?  

Is this why she thinks that maybe she was setup somehow?  And at the end of this first communication she claims that she was an outsider who could not wait to get out of her job as she was not comfortable there?  And why was she not comfortable?  That is very interesting.

Now here is Holli's second response;

Holli M Cohoon  1:32am Aug 9 

"Not long after leaving the sheriff's office, she gave false statements in court against the victim in our news stories and also received a very large sum of money from the Gloucester Sheriff's Office. 

 Not long after that, Holli opened a new business.. One could say that the Sunrise Donuts Shop has been financed by the tax payers of Gloucester County as the Sheriff's Office is not supposed to be a money making enterprise. The finances come from we the tax payers." 

 Whatever wording you choose.. the above sounds like a "payoff". Again, I did not recieve "a large sum of money" from the Sheriffs Office. Or any sum of money from the Sheriffs Office. No, I dont believe I was "set up" , my comment was facetious. I was simply the second chair dispatcher that day. I have given you my side of the story, the truth. Its just not nearly as exciting as the version you are posting. I find it interesting that you say you dont publish the so called "victims" name in your report, yet I am now a victim and you have no problem posting mine. I am being wrongfully accused of lying and being involved in a 'conspiracy", it is quite hurtful and damaging to my reputation. In reguards to the recent posting about how I got -  Name removed' - address for the Protective Order.. I was not assisted by the Sheriffs Office, I just"googled" her name. Just goes to show how something so simple can be turned around to a sinister nature. Again, I request that you do not post anything else about me or my business.

  The top part of this response has to do with another article written about Holli.  We received inside information from someone close to Holli who volunteered a great deal of news to us.  Everything we were able to check came out verified and one area we could not verify without breaking a number of laws, so in a case like this, one has to deem the information as being valid based on all other verified information.

  We could not report the exact statements given to us as it has the potential to reveal the person who gave us this information.  If that should happen, the person who revealed the information would then have to file protective orders against Holli in fear of retaliation.  With that said, we are still not revealing the exact information that was given to us and we are choosing to protect the informant.  To clarify though, there is no reason to believe that Holli received some kind of direct payoff for lying in court.  That was not our statement and never has been.

  The second part of this response deals with Holli now claiming to be a victim.  It's fair to say that she has become a victim.  While these responses have been going on, this is the same time that Holli had filed for protective orders against the victim in this case.  The first hearing was in Holli's favor but was contested and an appeal was filed.  The appeal was held a little over a week later.

  Judge Long heard the appeal, in our opinion, there is a clear conflict of interest here in having Judge Long hearing that appeal, we reported before the first hearing that judge Long was one of the people who should not hear this case because of potential conflicts of interest.  However, we have reviewed all the details on this case already and will not press that issue.  Based on information that came out in the protective order hearing, I have to side with Judge Long.  He was correct in granting the order.

  The details mainly are based on a video the victim shot outside of Holli's Sunrise Donuts shop and then posted the video on Facebook and then proceeded to post some comments afterwards that were considered to be a potential threat to Holli.  

  Now here is where the story continues to twist and turn and get even more bizarre.  The behavior could not be considered normal.  The victim has since been to a doctor and diagnosed as suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD.  Please CLICK HERE  to see more about PTSD from the Mayo Clinic's website.  Though this does NOT justify the victim's actions, it does explain the victim;s actions against Holli,  

  The victim in this case has been through so much over the past several years that she keeps reliving the entire event of the illegal raid and all the issues that have followed.  The victim lives in a constant state of fear because of all of these issues.  She worries about suffering another illegal raid and even possibly being killed by the local Sheriff's Office Deputies or Animal Control Officers.  She also worries about what the courts may do and that they might try to lock her up.  This is an everyday event for her.  This is what numerous county officials and employees have created.  

  Now there are other interesting statements that Holli makes in her remarks.  She states that she has told the truth but is now being put into the middle of a conspiracy.  Does this mean that she knows that a conspiracy exists?  And if she knows that a conspiracy exists, why is she going along with it?  That would make her a part of the conspiracy and lying to cover it up.  Each time she has sent a response to us, she has had some very serious holes in her story that open a lot more questions.

http://www.facebook.com/holli.cohoon?sk=friends&v=friends&ft_ref=fbsa  Here is a link to Holli's friends page on Facebook.  She claims to not have been friends with people in the Gloucester County Sheriff's Office.  These remarks are right on this page in her own writing.   Her page sure tells another story.  She has a bunch of friends from the Gloucester County Sheriff's office.  But remember Holli does not lie.  She told us so herself numerous times.  In the event she removes these friends, we have taken numerous screen shots that show the state of friends on this date and time.  Friends from the Gloucester County Sheriff's Office, Animal Control and local county court system.  

Ex 911 operator holli cohoon's facebook friends listings from Chuck Thompson

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.

Have a news story? Submit it above.

Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.

Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.

We cover what no one else will.

Gloucester, VA Courts - More Questionable Documents?

In our last article, we discussed how the local Gloucester County Courts failed to give Due Process in this case, now we are going to explore further issues with documents coming from our local courts.  For one thing, Holli M Cohoon now has a change on this form that was not in her original Emergency Protective Order.  Before she claimed she was afraid for her life and that of her families life as well.  Now we see that she is just concerned for herself.

  In the Emergency Protective Order, the form said weapons involved.  This form makes no claims about weapons.  What we are seeing here is a flip flopping of Holli M Cohoon's concept of concern.  Makes you wonder.  We had legal council look over this form and the original Emergency Protective order and he thought it very odd the change in the way the order was changed, how the order was changed and how it even went to a second order.

He also had some very serious concerns with the judge's signature.  The section in the form pictured here is where the judge sign's the form.  What is made on this form is commonly refereed to as a peasant's mark.  A peasant's mark dates back in history for peasant's who were illiterate and just created a mark in place of their name.  When this is done, a judge is supposed to have a stamp showing the judge's name on the document so everyone knows who authorized it.

  A peasant's mark is acceptable as a way to sign documents, but overlooking that stamp when one does this is suspect.  You can click on the form and it will open to a larger document that you can read.  It's also interesting to note that this document has a valid time and date stamp that was electronically added. The time and date stamp reads 5:07 PM and dated for July 26th, 2012.  This is exactly what the original search warrant lacked that is at the very front of this argument.  https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/  Is the link to read the full story on how all of this began.

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.

Have a news story? Submit it above.

Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.

Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.

We cover what no one else will.

Holli M Cohoon Continues Her Attacks On Victim

Holli M Cohoon, the 911 operator who gave phony testimony against the victim we have been reporting about continues her attacks on the victim.  We have added this copy of yet another petition for a protective order coming from Holli.  This one delivered after the other one expired.

  We removed the victim's name from the document. This particular order has a court date added to the bottom.  August 2nd, 2012 at 3:00 PM at the Gloucester County Court House.  Something that was missing from the Emergency Protective Order.

  Now anyone can get an emergency protective order against anyone else at any time.  The procedure is quite simple.  You just have to stand before a Magistrate and state a complaint and the order will be given.  Get to this next level is much harder however and the nasty little trick that Gloucester County used to create this one was very underhanded and will be our next article.

  Also, from what we have been informed, the way in which this order was delivered was highly questionable.  Here is what we have been told in the way in which this was handled.  Numerous Gloucester County Sheriff's Deputies delivered this describing this only as a two week extension of the first order and that there could be a third extension.  They were very sure to point out that this was only an extension.  Not a summons to appear in court.

  Now why would the Sheriff's Deputies do this?  Were they hoping that by misrepresenting the paper that the victim in this case would not bother to read it?  Maybe then not bother to show up in court?  That is what we are betting on.  Now what could possibly be gained by doing such a nasty trick?  We will cover that in another story.

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.

Have a news story? Submit it above.

Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.

Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.

We cover what no one else will.

Is Holli Cohoon Stalking This Victim? Gloucester, VA Board of Supervisors Do Not Deny Corruption

One of our team members posed an interesting legal question that we just are not able to answer.  How did Holli Cohoon get the address of the victim in this case?  Did she pull favors from the Gloucester, VA Sheriff's Office who would have then illegally given Holli the victim's private information?  Did the information come from maybe an old friend at the 911 call center who would have had access to pull those files and again illegally gave them to Holli?  Or is someone in the Gloucester, VA Sheriff's Office using Holli as a front?

  Here are some interesting points.  We sent detailed information about this case to the Gloucester, VA Board of Supervisors.  We received confirmation that they received the emails.  They have done nothing about the information about the case hence they do not deny the corruption.  Because we have shed a lot of light on the corruption of the Gloucester County Sheriff''s Office, Gloucester County Animal Control and a number of members of the court system and even the county attorney, Ted Wilmot, this looks like a way in which they are trying to stop the news from coming out.  Did we get to close to some other corruption?  Property tax abuses or something else?

Go back and look at Holli's court testimony against the victim in this case and listen to the 911 call.  They do NOT match up.   In fact, we contracted a professional 911 operator who explained in detail to us every area on the 911 recording that protocol was thrown out and nothing on that call could have been authentic in any way.  The recording was a complete violation of 911 procedures.  https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/segment-3  This is a link right to the 911 call recording as provided by the Gloucester County, VA Sheriff's Office and used in court.

https://sites.google.com/site/gloucestervanews/segment-4 is Holli's actual court testimony.  So it would seen that the victims are once again being victimized even further.

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.

Have a news story? Submit it above.

Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.

Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.

We cover what no one else will.

Holli M Cohoon Now Harassing Victim?

Is Holli M Cohoon now harassing the victim she gave highly questionable testimony against?  

Let's go back to the beginning on this.  Holli M Cohoon was once a 911 operator for the Gloucester, VA Sheriff's Office.  We have been reporting for some time now on this case and we have shown that at the very least, Holli has lied in court.  Now all of a sudden from out of nowhere, the victim gets this emergency protective order a few days after we released a story on Holli and her Sunrise Donut shop.

  The victim in this case was initially raided by the Gloucester, VA Sheriff's Office, under Sheriff Steve Gentry, and Gloucester, VA Animal control without a search warrant.  A search warrant was not issued to this victim until later in the day after she was released from jail.  This victim had no idea was she was even taken to jail.

Click Image to enlarge.  Names and personal 
information removed for privacy.

We have shown that the search warrant that was given to the victim after being released from jail was not valid in any area of law.  We showed also that this victim had all kinds of false evidence used against her by Gloucester, VA Animal Control and the Gloucester, VA Sheriff's Office.  We show that Holli's testimony was no where near the other false evidence given by others presenting further false evidence.
We have shown how the evidence is false.

  The victim in this case has been working on a lawsuit against Holli M Cohoon for some time now and it is opinion that Holli may have gotten wind of a pending lawsuit and is using this as a way to throw off the case.  So is this a harassment attempt by Holli?

 When putting together a lawsuit, you get detailed information on what the other party owns in order to determine if the lawsuit can be justified.

Now here is some other information we find very interesting.  We went over the above document with a fine tooth comb and see that Gloucester County court officials followed everything to the letter of the law.  Now how is it they can do this now but were unable to do this in the past?  Every area properly signed, every aspect properly dated and executed.  Yet on the search warrant given after the raid on the victim, nothing was done properly.  Go back into our archives and see for yourself.  We posted that evidence.  Or Click Here to see all the evidence from this case.

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.

Have a news story? Submit it above.

Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.

Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.

We cover what no one else will.

Sunrise Donuts Funded By Tax Payers? Holli M Cohoon Updated

Sunrise Donuts Funded By Tax Payers?

GVLN – Holli Cohoon 911 Operator Update

175,000 People Can't Be Wrong – Gloucester, VA Links and News

 

Well we have learned some very interesting facts about Holli Cohoon who was the 911 operator with the Gloucester County Sheriff's office during the time of the case we have been reporting on. Only weeks after she took the 911 call from the victim, she left the Sheriff's office. Not long after leaving the sheriff's office, she gave false statements in court against the victim in our news stories and also received a very large sum of money from the Gloucester Sheriff's Office.

View Larger Map

  

Not long after that, Holli opened a new business. Sunrise Donuts located on route 17 south in White Marsh next to the Hampton Tobacco shop, another business recently in our news spotlight. One could say that the Sunrise Donuts Shop has been financed by the tax payers of Gloucester County as the Sheriff's Office is not supposed to be a money making enterprise. The finances come from we the tax payers.

Local community reaction to the shop has been a mixed bag. Some complain about the higher prices and quality not being as good as other local competition, along with being an extra stop not worth making while others do not mind paying the higher costs and have no issues with the quality and limited selections.

Some of the complaints heard by local patrons is selections being sold out early with no more production for the day and being a chronic issue. Hours of operation have also been addressed as a concern by many locals.

News stories are starting to flood in about other extremely questionable activities stemming from Gloucester Animal Control. Our files are now bulging and our research is stretched and we will continue to collect all the files. Jeff Stillman has come into our recent spotlight along with the requests on him from his wife about animals she has wanted. We are investigating this story right now.

We are also now uncovering Monique Donner, Esq, ties to USERL and how she has been actively involved in highly questionable raids then acts as a prosecutor against those she was actively involved in said raids. Is there a question of ethics and a conflict of interest?

We have further learned how Gloucester Animal Control is tied in with USERL and have documentation that Gloucester Animal Control never dares raid a property that has horses without USERL when it comes to the bigger raids. Plus we have uncovered the financial scams that finance highly questionable raids throughout the nation and how they all work. Money that is funneled in by the ASPCA on raids where there are more than 12 horses on a property. Profits abound in these raids and then there is the collection of financial donations that certain non profit organizations take in on top of the money they make on these raids. What a business. Robin Hood is still alive and well but gives nothing to the poor.

In fact we have uncovered a demographic that raids fit into. Well off but not rich. Just enough money to be comfortable and maintain a comfortable lifestyle, but not wealthy enough to defend themselves in very expensive court battles. Even if they do mount an offensive, they normally can't afford the constant put offs normal in the court systems and also mounted by lawyers.

A special press release edition on the Sunrise Donuts part of this story is available for download with republication rights granted as long as the copy is not altered in any way including it's embedded links.

TTC Media further grants the right to title the story header on your site in other ways for publication.

We continue to watch all of the pages Gloucesterva.info continues to put into the search engines to stave off any potential negative news that could potentially affect the county. The problem is that it is choking the local search engines from being able to show local community businesses as well, seriously hurting local commerce. More of your tax dollars working hard against you.

For all the latest news, please click on the Home button towards the top of this site.

Have a news story? Submit it above.

Some of Gloucester's most incredible history is found on this site in detail.

Gloucester, VA Links and News – A GVLN Website.

We cover what no one else will.

Get a Press Release Version of the Sunrise Donuts story by itself;  CLICK HERE

License:  Reprint rights are granted so long as there are no changes to the story and link backs are properly made to this site.

MP3 Free Download.  Waderman - Wattlaufer - Smooth Jazz with light island mix.  Great for a hot sumer night.  CLICK HERE for your free copy.

Holli M Cohoon's Time Now Officially Up

Holli M Cohoon was offered a special deal if she would come forward and tell the truth about the 911 call recording and her testimony.  Holli was the 911 dispatcher in this case.  In an earlier post we showed how the 911 recording does not match her testimony and the 911 call also does not match Animal Control's file DW_C0152 audio.  So we know that all the evidence is falsely manufactured.  We gave Holli 2 weeks to come forward with the correct information on all of this.  Well her time is up and the offer is now fully withdrawn.  She can now be fully accountable for her testimony and her place in this case.

Gloucester, VA Links and News.  GVLN Website.