Challenge Jurisdiction? See What Happens Next from Chuck Thompson
What I need to point out in the above legal document in the above container is that at no time did the defendant ever communicate with the Commonwealth attorney's office that the defendant suffered PTSD. That information is incorrect. Also Commonwealth Assistant Attorney from Virginia Beach, Virginia states that defendant filed frivolous motions. I have read those motions and did not find anything frivolous in them. But I am not a BAR attorney. Nor would I ever dream of wasting my time in becoming one.
Here is what they do not want you to know however the defendant challenged jurisdiction. All the courts throughout the US either have already or are presently having their jurisdiction challenged at every level by the National Liberty Alliance. http://nationallibertyalliance.org/ Please visit the link to see for yourself. I would also recommend everyone join who is not an attorney or Judge to stop the criminal courts. (Again, my opinion). The NLA will not accept anyone who is a Judge or attorney into membership because they are part of the problem.
If a revolution does occur in this country again, I believe it will be brought about by either the actions/inaction's of the courts in this country. Not because of politics. What I have been witnessing over the past few months is nothing short of showing me that the real criminals in this country are running the court systems and they do not dispense justice. But let's look at some more facts.
What I need to point out in the above legal document in the above container is that at no time did the defendant ever communicate with the Commonwealth attorney's office that the defendant suffered PTSD. That information is incorrect. Also Commonwealth Assistant Attorney from Virginia Beach, Virginia states that defendant filed frivolous motions. I have read those motions and did not find anything frivolous in them. But I am not a BAR attorney. Nor would I ever dream of wasting my time in becoming one.
Here is what they do not want you to know however the defendant challenged jurisdiction. All the courts throughout the US either have already or are presently having their jurisdiction challenged at every level by the National Liberty Alliance. http://nationallibertyalliance.org/ Please visit the link to see for yourself. I would also recommend everyone join who is not an attorney or Judge to stop the criminal courts. (Again, my opinion). The NLA will not accept anyone who is a Judge or attorney into membership because they are part of the problem.
If a revolution does occur in this country again, I believe it will be brought about by either the actions/inaction's of the courts in this country. Not because of politics. What I have been witnessing over the past few months is nothing short of showing me that the real criminals in this country are running the court systems and they do not dispense justice. But let's look at some more facts.
Judge Sward's Outrageous Court Order, Portsmouth, VA Judge from Chuck Thompson
This order was created by Judge Sward of Portsmouth, Virginia and is not factual in my opinion as I was a witness to these proceedings and all the events that have occurred throughout the start of these actions. I know every facet of the case as I have read every document and have done research in multiple areas in order to assist both the defendant and her husband has also been working on research to assist with her case. We all have spent a vast amount of hours speaking on this subject and digging through everything we can find.
Judge Sward stated that he did not see PTSD as an issue in the defendants case as any form of possible issue for her competency. He denied her motions for dismissal but stated that defendant had some very valid points in those motions. Witnesses to this case on this day can all testify that the defendant did not show a lack of competency for the defendant to continue to move forward.
What is even worse is that Judge Sward heard no evidence other than from the prosecuting attorney, Wendy Alexander from Virginia Beach, that defendant filed frivolous motions that she later stated she refused to answer but that the motions contained valid points in regards to competency of the defendant.
Wait, did anyone read that correctly? Wendy Alexander stated she refused to answer the defendants motions as they were frivolous yet still stated that the motions had valid points. Can anyone say corruption? Judge Sward ignored these little facts. The defendant had moved the court to have special prosecutor recused for a number of reasons that I consider very valid. For one, in a previous hearing, Wendy Alexander pretty well called the defendant insane. The defendant brought this up before judge Sward but he decided to give his interpretation on what Wendy Alexander meant by her statements without having been the judge in the hearing where Wendy Alexander made that specific statement.
Now these actions are supposed to be in Circuit Court, but the court where Wendy Alexander made this statement was in a General District Court in front of Judge Shaw who had not yet been inaugurated into his position as a Circuit Court judge and there was not court reporter in the room and the defendant as well as several witnesses including myself were moved out of the actual Circuit Court courtroom where an actual court reporter was. We were the only ones moved to the General District Court courtroom. This was put together by Wendy Alexander with the aid of Holly Smith Gloucester, Virginia Commonwealth attorney.
Now in my own view that was criminal intent with intent to commit fraud. Wendy on January 27th, 2015 did not want a court reporter in the court. Here is what happened in that courtroom before Judge Shaw that day. First Wendy pretty well called the defendant insane and was arguing to put the defendant under evaluation then. She then argued that she wanted to try the case right there on the spot. Wait. Who is the real insane person here? Wendy first argued that the defendant was not competent to stand trial or defend herself and then Wendy wants to start a trial right on the spot. Judge Shaw stopped her on the spot in that area.
Now lets have some real fun. The next action in this case is it moves to jury trial. The defendant has never been identified by any of the judges in any of the 4 previous hearings, the defendant has never given a plea at anytime, the defendant has always contended that the court lacks jurisdiction and the courts continue to move forward anyway. Wait, who are the criminals here? The defendant has been accused of statutory violations that are so vague that even the supreme court has ruled that to be the case. Plus, the courts have even stated that the statutes are not even violations under common law which Virginia Code, 1-200 states that all codes must be interpreted to the meaning of common law. Plus this comes from West's annotated Virginia Code on the above so called statutory violations. (Part of the research I helped with.)
Even more hilarious but very sad and maddening is what Judge Sward also said during this hearing. These motions have obviously been put together by someone with legal knowledge and skill but lacking a legal education. I take that to mean that the defendant did not go to law school and is not a member of the BAR so that is an automatic disqualification and reason for a mental evaluation. Again: who are the criminals here?
Oh, and have I mentioned that the Commonwealth has been withholding evidence from the defendant and stated in court that they would continue to withhold evidence from the defendant? Not only that, but Judge Sward was asked about evidence provided to the court and if he saw the evidence. He confessed he knew nothing about the evidence that was brought up in question and the two court clerks in the room looked at each other very surprised. Why? Was it because it was withheld from judge Sward? He immediately ended the hearing after he admitted to not seeing the evidence or knowing anything about it. I have to keep asking who the real criminals are here.
Now Judge Sward came across as a nice guy, but he danced around the defendants questions and it was very clear to everyone who was there witnessing the hearing, that Judge Sward had no intention of allowing a fair hearing. He even threatened the defendant with a revoking her bond and throwing her in jail if she did not consent to the psychiatric evaluation and that he would force compliance anyway.
Let's also look at some other oddities of this particular hearing. It was done as a stand alone hearing on a Thursday when all other Circuit Court business was conducted on Tuesday. It was held in the basement in a hearing room. No docket was posted and when we all asked for a copy of the docket in the Circuit Court clerks office, we were told that there was no Circuit Court cases being heard that day and there was no docket. Others who were going to join us as witnesses were not able to find us in the hearing room as they were also told the same thing, there are no cases today. We did get a copy of the days docket. It states Circuit Court hearing to hear motions. There was no court reporter at the front of the room. No court reporter was sworn in after Judge Sward came into the room. I believe I did recognize a court reporter in the back of the room who was only there witnessing the proceedings, and not taking any notes, so that the element could be covered. But the element was not properly executed as required to be a court of record. So that means this was once again a District Court proceeding done under the guise of a Circuit Court hearing and it was not public.
Again, who are the criminals? Oh this continues to get a lot more interesting but we are going to save that for other posts.
This order was created by Judge Sward of Portsmouth, Virginia and is not factual in my opinion as I was a witness to these proceedings and all the events that have occurred throughout the start of these actions. I know every facet of the case as I have read every document and have done research in multiple areas in order to assist both the defendant and her husband has also been working on research to assist with her case. We all have spent a vast amount of hours speaking on this subject and digging through everything we can find.
Judge Sward stated that he did not see PTSD as an issue in the defendants case as any form of possible issue for her competency. He denied her motions for dismissal but stated that defendant had some very valid points in those motions. Witnesses to this case on this day can all testify that the defendant did not show a lack of competency for the defendant to continue to move forward.
What is even worse is that Judge Sward heard no evidence other than from the prosecuting attorney, Wendy Alexander from Virginia Beach, that defendant filed frivolous motions that she later stated she refused to answer but that the motions contained valid points in regards to competency of the defendant.
Wait, did anyone read that correctly? Wendy Alexander stated she refused to answer the defendants motions as they were frivolous yet still stated that the motions had valid points. Can anyone say corruption? Judge Sward ignored these little facts. The defendant had moved the court to have special prosecutor recused for a number of reasons that I consider very valid. For one, in a previous hearing, Wendy Alexander pretty well called the defendant insane. The defendant brought this up before judge Sward but he decided to give his interpretation on what Wendy Alexander meant by her statements without having been the judge in the hearing where Wendy Alexander made that specific statement.
Now these actions are supposed to be in Circuit Court, but the court where Wendy Alexander made this statement was in a General District Court in front of Judge Shaw who had not yet been inaugurated into his position as a Circuit Court judge and there was not court reporter in the room and the defendant as well as several witnesses including myself were moved out of the actual Circuit Court courtroom where an actual court reporter was. We were the only ones moved to the General District Court courtroom. This was put together by Wendy Alexander with the aid of Holly Smith Gloucester, Virginia Commonwealth attorney.
Now in my own view that was criminal intent with intent to commit fraud. Wendy on January 27th, 2015 did not want a court reporter in the court. Here is what happened in that courtroom before Judge Shaw that day. First Wendy pretty well called the defendant insane and was arguing to put the defendant under evaluation then. She then argued that she wanted to try the case right there on the spot. Wait. Who is the real insane person here? Wendy first argued that the defendant was not competent to stand trial or defend herself and then Wendy wants to start a trial right on the spot. Judge Shaw stopped her on the spot in that area.
Now lets have some real fun. The next action in this case is it moves to jury trial. The defendant has never been identified by any of the judges in any of the 4 previous hearings, the defendant has never given a plea at anytime, the defendant has always contended that the court lacks jurisdiction and the courts continue to move forward anyway. Wait, who are the criminals here? The defendant has been accused of statutory violations that are so vague that even the supreme court has ruled that to be the case. Plus, the courts have even stated that the statutes are not even violations under common law which Virginia Code, 1-200 states that all codes must be interpreted to the meaning of common law. Plus this comes from West's annotated Virginia Code on the above so called statutory violations. (Part of the research I helped with.)
Even more hilarious but very sad and maddening is what Judge Sward also said during this hearing. These motions have obviously been put together by someone with legal knowledge and skill but lacking a legal education. I take that to mean that the defendant did not go to law school and is not a member of the BAR so that is an automatic disqualification and reason for a mental evaluation. Again: who are the criminals here?
Oh, and have I mentioned that the Commonwealth has been withholding evidence from the defendant and stated in court that they would continue to withhold evidence from the defendant? Not only that, but Judge Sward was asked about evidence provided to the court and if he saw the evidence. He confessed he knew nothing about the evidence that was brought up in question and the two court clerks in the room looked at each other very surprised. Why? Was it because it was withheld from judge Sward? He immediately ended the hearing after he admitted to not seeing the evidence or knowing anything about it. I have to keep asking who the real criminals are here.
Now Judge Sward came across as a nice guy, but he danced around the defendants questions and it was very clear to everyone who was there witnessing the hearing, that Judge Sward had no intention of allowing a fair hearing. He even threatened the defendant with a revoking her bond and throwing her in jail if she did not consent to the psychiatric evaluation and that he would force compliance anyway.
Let's also look at some other oddities of this particular hearing. It was done as a stand alone hearing on a Thursday when all other Circuit Court business was conducted on Tuesday. It was held in the basement in a hearing room. No docket was posted and when we all asked for a copy of the docket in the Circuit Court clerks office, we were told that there was no Circuit Court cases being heard that day and there was no docket. Others who were going to join us as witnesses were not able to find us in the hearing room as they were also told the same thing, there are no cases today. We did get a copy of the days docket. It states Circuit Court hearing to hear motions. There was no court reporter at the front of the room. No court reporter was sworn in after Judge Sward came into the room. I believe I did recognize a court reporter in the back of the room who was only there witnessing the proceedings, and not taking any notes, so that the element could be covered. But the element was not properly executed as required to be a court of record. So that means this was once again a District Court proceeding done under the guise of a Circuit Court hearing and it was not public.
Again, who are the criminals? Oh this continues to get a lot more interesting but we are going to save that for other posts.
.jpg)
